background image
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum:
How-To Guide 
Prepared by: Partnership for Disaster Resilience 
© 2007, University of Oregon’s Community Service Center
FEMA
FEMA
PDR
PDR
PDR
FEMA
FEMA
background image
background image
background image
.
Table of Contents
Disaster Cycle .................................................................................. 3
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning.................................................... 4
The Community Forum ................................................................... 5
Task 1: Build the Forum Organizing Team ..................................... 6
Task 2: Identify and Invite Forum Participants ............................. 8
Task 3: Collect Community Based Data........................................ 10
Task 4: Facilitate Forum Session 1................................................ 12
Task 5: Develop Draft Strategies...................................................20
Task 6: Facilitate Forum Session 2 ............................................... 22
Task 7: Develop Workplan ............................................................ 23
Afterward ....................................................................................... 24
Resources....................................................................................... 25
Cascadia Subduction Zone
Earthquakes: A Magnitude 9.0
Earthquake Scenario
The scenario was developed to
provide information to
government agencies,
businesses, and families about
the potential effects of a
Subduction earthq
uake. The
scenario defines a Subduction
zone earthq
uake, provides case
studies from Sumatra and
Alaska, and outlines the M9
.
0
scenario for various regions in
the Pacific Northwest.
“A Cascadia earthquake will
seriously affect our region, but it
won’t destroy us. We will rebuild
our cities, our neighborhoods, and
our businesses. The time it takes us
to recover will depend largely on
what preparations we make before
the earthquake.”
- M9.0 Earthquake
  Scenario Executive 
  Summary 
page 2
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
Guide funded by:  
Cascadia Region Earthquake Workgroup, United States Geological Survey 
background image
background image
page 4
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
Goals
The goals of post-disaster 
recovery planning are to:
issues
external resources
mitigation projects
Notes:
Planning: the act or process of making or carrying out plans; 
specifically: the establishment of goals, policies, and procedures for a 
social or economic unit
.
  -Merriam-Webster’s 
Online 
Dictionary
Community planning requires that interested parties work together to 
identify alternatives for a desired outcome. Recovery planning is no 
different. Post-disaster recovery planning is a shared responsibility 
between individuals, private businesses and industries, state and local 
governments, and the federal government.
Post-disaster recovery planning is defined as developing a set of 
strategies to assist a community in rebuilding after a disaster occurs.
Recovery planning can also be thought of as building the blueprint for 
reconstruction of the community after a disaster. There are a number of 
activities that communities can engage in to address post-disaster 
recovery. These strategies may include developing and implementing:
principles for reconstruction.
In addition to post-disaster recovery planning, mitigation, or loss 
reduction activities (such as relocating critical facilities out of harm’s 
way) can also help communities become more disaster resilient by 
removing the potential for damage before an event occurs.
and reconstruction - both locally and regionally - is the first step in the 
development of a long-term recovery plan. 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning 
background image
page 5 
The Community Forum 
Purpose of this Guide
The process outlined in this guide 
will provide you with the essential 
building blocks for starting a 
post-disaster recovery planning 
initiative in your community. The 
process was designed to get 
community decision makers, 
professionals, and residents to 
think holistically about how their 
communities “tick” and how 
disaster events could affect all of 
the systems upon which they 
depend.
Pre-Forum Phase
Build the Forum Organizing Team 
Identify and Invite Forum Participants 
Collect Community-Based Data
1
2
3
Facilitate Forum Session 1
Develop Draft Strategies
Facilitate Forum Session 2
During-Forum Phase
4
5
6
Develop Workplan
Post-Forum Phase
7
Notes:
.
One way to begin the post-disaster recovery planning process in your 
community is to host a community forum. A community forum provides 
a platform for local governments and community organizations to share 
resources and information in order to better prepare their community to 
recover from a catastrophic disaster. The Forum process also allows 
community members and technical experts to work together to integrate 
vulnerability data with local knowledge, values and experience. 
This guide outlines a community process that engages broad and diverse
community stakeholders to begin community level discussions about the 
potential impacts of a catastrophic disaster. Specifically, the guide 
identifies a process for organizing resources to develop, implement and 
document a community post-disaster recovery forum to identify critical 
issues and needs. 
The Forum planning process includes three phases and seven tasks 
(shown below). Each task includes facilitator ideas that provide helpful 
tips based on over 30 years of working collaboratively with 
communities.
background image
"Our organization had been 
engaged in all-hazards response 
and business continuity activities 
prior to the forum. The biggest 
benefit was being asked to come to 
the table. Typically private 
industry does not get that 
opportunity in community 
planning efforts. This forum 
recognized that the majority of 
utilities are maintained by private 
industry and gave us the 
opportunity to participate and 
form new partnerships."
 
- Private Utility Company  
 
   Representative 
page 6
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
If possible, develop a diverse Forum Team so that different 
skill sets are represented and can be utilized.
You may want to seek guidance from elected officials about 
who should be involved.
Facilitator Ideas
Build the Forum Organizing Team 
1
Create the team
Your first task is to find a person or a team of people that will be 
responsible for organizing, facilitating, and documenting the Forum and 
its outcomes. This should be a project-specific team that has one focus – 
to organize and host the Post-Disaster Recovery Forum. 
The Forum Team can consist of whomever is interested in recovery 
planning. However, we suggest involving people from the following 
agencies/disciplines: emergency management, city planning, business, 
public works, and neighborhood associations. Although Forum planning 
can be accomplished by one person, an ideal team consists of 4-6 
organizers.
What’s involved?
Create the team
Develop the agenda
Photos courtesy of PDR
background image
page 7
 
As you develop the agenda for the Forum, think about how 
identifying issues and strategies related to post-disaster recovery 
can benefit other community planning efforts, such as: 
comprehensive plan, emergency operations plan, capital 
improvement plans, and economic development strategic plans. 
Facilitator Ideas
Task 1
: Build the Forum Organizing Team
Products
 
Forum Organizing Team
 Forum 
Agenda
 
Schedule for Forum
 Development
.
Develop the agenda
The purpose of the post-disaster forum is to identify community-specific 
issues related to long-term, catastrophic post-disaster recovery and to 
develop strategies to address those issues. The example agenda outlines a 
framework from which to work as you develop your community-specific 
process. Your community needs, issues and resources will determine the 
exact agenda. 
The Forum process works best when held as two separate work sessions.
Whether the sessions are on two consecutive days, or one month apart, is 
up to you and depends on your resources and overall timeline. The 
separation between sessions allows the Forum organizers to synthesize 
information gathered at the first session and present it during the second 
session so that community members can move from identifying issues to 
defining strategies. 
Agenda
Session 1 (2
-4
 hours)* 
I
.
Why are we here today? (Welcome, Introductions, Purpose of Meeting) 
I
I
.  
How could a  M9.0 earthquake affect our community? (CREW Scenario 9
.
0
 Overview) 
I
I
I
.
What is post-disaster recovery?  (Description of Emergency Management Cycle)
I
V.
What are the recovery issues facing our community? (Issue Identification Exercise) 
Session 2 (2
-4
 hours)* 
I
.
Why are we here today? (Introductions, Purpose of Meeting, Summary of  Session 1
I
I
.
What are the potential recovery strategies?  (Discussion of Draft Strategies)
I
.
Where do we go from here? (Next Steps)
*
I
f you schedule a meeting for more than 2
 hours, be sure to include breaks. 
1
background image
2
2
Emergency Services (police 
and fire)
Utilities
City Public Works
City Planning
Healthcare Organizations
Elected Officials
Local Business Leaders
School District
Department of Transportation
Home Builders Association
American Red Cross
Neighborhood Association
Chamber of Commerce
Vacation Rental Services
Media (newspaper, radio)
Social Service Providers
Who should be invited?
.
What’s involved?
Identify Participants 
It is important to think carefully about who should attend your 
Forum.  Consider inviting any organization or person who has an 
interest or stake in the community’s emergency preparedness efforts. 
Particularly important organizations to include are those who have the 
authority to make decisions about post-disaster recovery strategies. As 
a guide to creating the list, ask yourself, “Who are the key players in 
the community?”
Identify and Invite Forum Participants 
Use networks of people to expand invitee list. Ask key 
community members who they think should be involved.
Garner political buy-in from the City Council or other 
respected organizations before you start your process. This 
will help communicate the significance of the Forum to 
possible attendees 
When possible, try to identify a specific person at an 
organization rather than sending a generic invitation. 
Facilitator Ideas
Invite Participants & Develop Invitation 
Packet
Identify Participants
page 8
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
background image
2
2
Forum Agenda
CREW 9.0 S
cenario
Letter of Invitation*
*
S
ee “Resources” at the end of 
the guide for an unabridged 
example of an invitation letter.
page 9 
Packet Components
Invite Participants & Develop Invitation Packet
The invitation packet provides participants with essential information 
about the Forum. The materials should include a letter of invitation that 
explains the purpose, the expected outcome, the agenda, and the reason 
why the individual is being asked to participate. Very few participants 
will walk in the door with a true understanding of how tsunamis and 
earthquakes could affect their community or what long-term 
post-disaster recovery really means. Including the CREW Scenario is 
recommended because it can help paint the picture of what issues the 
community may face following a Cascadia Subduction Zone event.
To follow up with those people who do not respond to the 
invitation letter, develop a system of reminders including 
phone calls and emails.
Depending on local politics, consider having elected officials 
sign the invitation letter. If they have time, they can also help 
make follow-up phone calls to potential participants.
Stress the fact that participants need to read the packet before 
they come to the Forum, so that more time can be spent on 
identifying issues rather than on background information.
Facilitator Ideas
“The forum packet was very beneficial. It was nice to get 
something besides an agenda before a meeting. It was a 
good way to understand what the Forum was going to be 
about”
               
 
 
          - Pilot Forum Participant
Notes:
Task 2: Identify and Invite Forum Participants
background image
2
3
page 10
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
Population
Total population
Potential growth in population 
Age structure of population
Percentage of residents below 
the poverty level
Percentage of residents who 
don’t speak English primarily
Economy
B
iggest industries
Highest occupational categories
Median household income
Data on residents who 
commute to work
Cultural, Historic, & Natural 
Resources
S
tructures or landmarks on the 
National Historic Register
Locally significant structures
Archeological sites
Wetlands, estuaries, and 
preserves
Land Use & Development
Total area of community
Number, type and age structure 
of housing units
General land use patterns
Number and size of lots 
available for development
Data for Community Profile
What’s involved?
Collect Hazard History Information
Identify Existing Plans and Policies
Develop a Community Profile
Identify Existing Plans and Policies
Collecting information on the community’s existing plans and policies can 
assist you in answering the question - What does the community already 
have in place to address the hazard?
 The Forum Organizing Team should 
create an inventory of existing planning documents, policies, and programs 
that are applicable to post-disaster recovery. Knowing what is already in 
place is important because official planning documents and existing 
programs already have support from decision makers, businesses, and 
residents. They also may contain ready-made structures for implementing 
strategies discussed at the Forum. In addition to identifing plans, policies 
and programs, it is also helpful to identify community agencies that might 
be potential partners during the recovery phase.
Collect Hazard History Information
Collecting hazard history information can assist you in answering the 
question – How has the hazard impacted the community in the past?
Identify when, how, and where the hazard has impacted the community in 
the past. If possible, begin to identify what buildings, infrastructure or 
cultural assets might be located in the hazard zone. 
Develop a Community Profile
Pulling together a Community Profile can assist you in answering the 
question – What makes your community thrive? The Community Profile 
briefly describes the overall characteristics of the community based upon 
four themes: (1) population, (2) economy, (3) cultural, historic, and natural 
resources, and (4) land use and development. This basic thematic data will 
provide participants with background information to help them identify 
potential losses and recovery issues. Before developing a new community 
profile, look at other plans because a profile may already have been 
developed.
Highlights from the Community Profile should be presented during Session 
1 of the Community Forum. 
Collect Community-Based Data
background image
2
3
Comprehensive Plan
Historic Preservation Plan 
Transportation Plan
Capital Improvement Plan
Economic Development Plan
Red Cross Outreach Program
B
usiness Continuity Training 
Program
Health and S
ocial S
ervices 
Programs
Community Organizations 
and S
ervice Clubs
Emergency Operations Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation 
Plan
Hazard V
ulnerability 
Assessments
page 11 
Example Plans, Policies, 
and Programs
.
Make sure that the Forum facilitators have a good 
understanding of the characteristics of the community and 
what factors might make the community more or less at risk. 
This knowledge can help keep the Forum discussions focused 
on the relevant issues and activities.
Develop a handout that lists the plans and programs and 
distribute it during the Issue Identification Exercise during 
Session 1 at the Forum.
Google Earth is an easy and free way to identify important 
community assets that might be located in the tsunami 
inundation zone.
All of the activities in this task should be completed prior to 
the Forum and then presented to the participants during the 
event. When this information is presented to Forum 
participants, it will assist in their understanding of the 
community’s vulnerability to natural hazards. It is especially 
helpful when it comes time to clearly define recovery 
strategies.
Facilitator Ideas
Notes:
Task 3: Collect Community-B
ased Data
background image
2
4
B
usiness continuity
Community visioning
Economic development
Reconstruction
Land use regulations
B
uilding moratoriums
Historic preservation
Planning for debris management
S
earch and rescue
Provision of food and water
Warning and evacuation
Critical infrastructure 
reconstruction
Damage assessment
Debris management
Recovery Planning is: 
Recovery Planning is NOT: 
Review Hazard Scenario
Description of Recovery Planning
Issue Identification Exercise
Closing Remarks
Introduction
.
Facilitate Forum Session 1 
Introduction
In the Introduction it is important to welcome everyone, introduce the 
facilitators and participants, cover logistics and schedule of the event, 
and the purpose and goals of the Forum.
Review Hazard Scenario
Starting off with a discussion of the hazard is helpful to give participants 
background on the hazard and the impacts it could have on the 
community. If the community is addressing the Cascadia event, use the 
CREW scenario to present potential regional effects of a Cascadia 
Subduction M9.0 earthquake. Community planners, public works staff, 
and emergency managers may be the most qualified people to talk about 
local impacts of hazards because they know where the people, buildings, 
and infrastructure are located within the community. 
Description of Recovery Planning
The purpose of this session is to distinguish between immediate response 
and post-disaster recovery planning. Emphasize that post-disaster 
recovery planning provides a long-term vision to re-develop a 
community after a disaster, not to address immediate life safety issues. 
In addition, emphasize the importance of addressing attitudes focused 
on “returning to normal”. In some cases, following catastrophic disasters, 
communities cannot return to normal. The disaster may cause changes 
in the physical, political, demographic or economic landscape. This 
requires that the community adapt and change as it recovers and 
reconstructs. Keeping these ideas in mind during the Forum can help 
partcipants think about how the community might work in the future. 
What’s involved?
page 12
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
background image
2
4
*
S
ee “Resources” at the end of 
the guide for a copy of the Issue 
Identification Worksheet.
*
By having each person complete and 
hand in an issue identification 
worksheet, you are able to capture 
the thoughts and ideas of all the 
participants. In some brainstorming 
processes, strong personalities can 
take over a group discussion and 
steer the group off course. The 
worksheet approach helps keep 
participants on track and allows 
everyone’s thoughts to be 
incorporated.
Posting each participant’s top 
priorities on the wall allows you to 
go from a large number of issues to a 
smaller group of the most critical 
issues which will help the 
community prioritize strategies.
Facilitator Ideas
page 13 
Provide the participants with instructions for completing the issue 
identification exercise.
Present highlights from the Population portion of the Community 
Profile.  This gives the participants important background information 
that they need to help them identify potential issues. Review thematic 
q
uestions to help participants identify issues. (Q
uestions are provided 
on the following pages.)
List as many issues as they can on the worksheet; work individually.
Circle top 3 issues on the worksheet.
Write top prioritized issues on piece of paper to post on the wall.
Lead discussion on top issues and document the issues discussed. 
Highlight any infrastructure-related issues that have been raised. 
Collect completed worksheets from participants. 
Repeat steps 2-7 for economy and land development themes.
Closing Remarks
When concluding Forum Session 1, it is important to talk about the next 
steps and how the issues the participants identified will be used. You’ll also 
want to cover what will be accomplished at Session 2 of the Forum. 
Facilitator: Summarize Issues 
Participants: Work on Issue Identification
Facilitator: Introduce Exercise 
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Issue Identification Exercise 
The primary goal of this exercise it to give participants an opportunity 
to discuss issues their community may face following a catastrophic 
event. This exercise asks the people who live and work in the 
community to identify community-specific recovery issues. The 
following process asks participants to identify and prioritize issues 
related to three general themes (population, economic development, 
and land and development). In addition, participants should be asked to 
identify specific infrastructure-related issues for each of the three 
themes. Basic instructions for this exercise are listed below. 
“This was a great way to narrow 
down to the core issues since we 
were such a diverse group.”
            - Pilot Forum Participant
S
ummarize the main issues identified so that participants can get a 
feel for what other community members are saying. Pay particular 
attention to issues that may have been raised in all three themes.
Task 4: Facilitate Forum S
ession 1
background image
2
4
.
Theme: Population
Facilitate Forum Session 1 
This theme looks at how the community’s population and demographics 
might influence or affect the community’s recovery process. 
Where do people live?
What, if any, special needs populations live in vulnerable areas 
(elderly, disabled, non-English speaking, children)? 
Where are there significant non-residential populations? 
Are there cultural or historic resources in the community that if 
damaged or lost would have a significant impact on residents?
Infrastructure questions:
 
What types of infrastructure do your residents rely upon?
 
Are there residents who need power for life safety equipment  
 
(e.g. breathing apparatus or oxygen, dialysis, etc.) to survive? 
Fictional Community 
Example
While natural hazards do not 
discriminate, the impacts - in 
terms of loss and the ability to 
recover - vary greatly, depending 
on certain demographic 
characteristics. According to the 
FEMA Preparedness, Training 
and Exercise Directorate, 80% of 
the disaster burden falls on the 
public. Women, children, 
minorities and the poor bear a 
disproportionate amount of this 
burden. The 2000 Census 
reported that 12% of Crewville’s 
residents were living below the 
poverty line. In Crewville, 8% of 
households are female-headed 
and 2% live below the poverty 
line. Eighty-five percent of 
residents in Crewville are white, 
11% are Hispanic or Latino, and 
less than 5% are African 
American, Asian, American 
Indian, Alaska Native or other 
races.
Questions
City Total
In Tsunami Zone
Percent
in Zone
Total population 
   701 
1542 
45% 
Median age 
50.6 
48 
African American
12 
47 
25% 
Native American
47 
62 
76% 
Asian
6 25 
24% 
Hispanic
6 175 3% 
Under 5 years old 
12 
325 
4% 
Over 65 years old 
93 
475 
20% 
Avg. no. of persons per household 
2.8 
3.1 
Houses
143 322 
44% 
Renter-occupied units 
65 
145 
45% 
Females
383 711 
54% 
page 14
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
background image
2
4
Theme: Population
Sample Recovery Issues for Population Theme
Here are sample recovery issues related to the population theme. 
Photos courtesy of FEMA
Facilitator Ideas
page 15 
Task
 4: Facilitate Forum Session 
background image
2
4
.
Facilitate Forum Session 1 
Fictional Community 
Example
Although Crewville’s permanent 
population is small (1,650), 
more than 400,000 tourists visit 
per year. The three top 
employers in Crewville are 
specifically involved in the 
hospitality service industry. The 
economic characteristics of 
Crewville demonstrate the city’s 
dependence on tourism. The 
three highest occupational 
categories in Crewville are 
management, professional, and 
related occupations (30%), 
service occupations (28%); and 
sales and office occupations 
(27%).
Research has shown that no 
business, small or large, is 
immune to the impacts of a 
natural hazard event. Research 
being conducted by the United 
Stated Geological Survey 
indicates that 80% of Crewville 
businesses are in the tsunami 
inundation zone. A catastrophic 
disaster event would directly 
impact the service sector of the 
economy. The ripple effect of 
business closures would impact 
not only tourists, but residents as 
well.
This theme looks at how the community’s economy might be impacted 
by an event. 
Theme: Economy
How will businesses be impacted by a disaster (e.g., earthquake, 
tsunami, flood)? 
 
What types of businesses will be impacted? 
 
Which ones are location dependent and which can be relocated?  
 
(e.g., a business in the fishing industry) 
What businesses represent significant components of your 
community’s economy? (e.g., 85% of economy comes from the fishing 
industry)
Is there available space or vacant buildings outside of the inundation 
zone where businesses could be relocated, if necessary? 
Are there cultural or historic resources that, if damaged or lost, would 
have a significant impact on the local economy? 
Infrastructure questions: 
 
How are segments of your economy dependent on infrastructure  
 
to function?  
 
What types of infrastructure does your local economy rely upon?
This table illustrates the number of businesses, employees and sales 
volume in the fictional community compared to the number of 
businesses, employees, and sales volume located in the tsunami zone. 
This type of data can help illustrate how vulnerable your local economy 
might be to the impact of a disaster.
Questions
In Tsunami Zone
Crewville Total
Percent
in Zone
Businesses
185
145 78% 
Employees 1476 
1189 
81% 
Sales Volume 
$108M 
$85M 
79% 
page 16
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
background image
Theme: Economy
2
4
.
Sample Recovery Issues for Economy Theme
The following are sample recovery issues related to the economy theme. 
Photos courtesy of FE
MA
concepts related to economic development include locating 
the disaster should also focus on developing outside of 
Facilitator Ideas
page 17
 
Task 4: Facilitate Forum Session 1
background image
2
4
Fictional Community 
Example
The severity of damage from a 
natural disaster depends upon 
the types of land use and the 
patterns of development in a 
community. Much of the 
commercial land use in Crewville 
is concentrated in the downtown 
area. This area is in close 
proximity to the beach and, 
according to existing data, most 
of it is located within the hazard 
zone.
At the bottom right is a graph 
that can be created prior to a 
post-disaster recovery workshop. 
Based on the integration of 
United Stated Geological Survey 
National Land Cover Dataset 
with tsunami-hazard information, 
the graph shows the types of 
land in a community, both in a 
tsunami-hazard zone (in dark 
orange) and for the entire 
community (in white). 
This graph shows that all of the 
land classified as “high-intensity 
developed,” which typically 
represents infrastructure, 
commercial and high-density 
residential areas, is in the 
tsunami zone. Approximately half 
of the land classified as 
“low-intensity developed,” which 
typically represents lower-density 
residential areas, is in the 
tsunami zone.
Theme: Land Use and Development
.
Facilitate Forum Session 1 
Do current development patterns or land use plans minimize 
development in vulnerable areas? 
Where in your community is growth projected to occur? 
What, if any, policies are in place to address post-disaster 
redevelopment?
How will the community provide temporary shelter and housing after 
a catastrophic event?
Infrastructure questions: 
 
Describe the relationship between infrastructure and land use and  
 
development in your community.  
 
What types of infrastructure are necessary to support  
 
 
post-disaster re-development?  
This theme looks at how the community’s land use and development 
might be impacted by an event.
Questions
Crewville Land Cover Type 
Percent by Area 
Bare Land 
Forest
Wetland
Grassland
Scrub/shrub
0
10
20
30
40
High Intensity 
Developed
Low Intensity 
Developed
City Total 
Tsunami Zone 
page 18
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
background image
2
4
Fictional Community  
Example
The severity of damage from a
natural disaster depends upon
the types of land use and the
patterns of development in a
community. Much of the
commercial land use in Crewville  
is concentrated in the downtown
area. This area is in close
proximity to the beach and,  
according to existing data, most  
of it is located within the hazard
zone.
To the left is a graph that can be
created prior to a post-disaster  
recovery workshop. Based on the
integration of USGS National
Land Cover Dataset with  
tsunami-hazard information, the
graph shows the types of land in
a community, both in a
tsunami-hazard zone (in dark
orange) and for the entire
community (in white).
This graph shows that all of the  
land classified as “high-intensity  
developed,” which typically  
represents infrastructure,
commercial and high-density
residential areas, is in the  
tsunami zone. Approximately half
of the land classified as  
“low-intensity developed,” which  
typically represents lower-density
residential areas, is in the  
tsunami zone. 
Land Use and Development 
page 19
Do current development patterns or land use plans minimize
development in vulnerable areas?
Where in your community is growth projected to occur?
What, if any, policies are in place to address post-disaster
redevelopment?
How will the community provide temporary shelter and housing after
a catastrophic event? 
Infrastructure questions:
Describe the relationship between infrastructure and land use and
development in your community.
What types of infrastructure are necessary to support 
post-disaster re-development?
This theme looks at how the community’s land use and development  
might be impacted by an event. 
Questions
Land Cover Type 
Percent by Area 
Bare Land 
Forest
Wetland
Grassland
Scrub/shrub
0
10
20
30
40
High Intensity 
Developed
Low Intensity 
Developed
City Total 
Tsunami Zone 
Task 4: Facilitate Forum Session 1
background image
2
5
.
Summarize Issues 
During Session 1, participants identified many issues related to the three 
community themes. The Forum Organizing Team should review both the 
prioritized issues that were posted on the wall during Session 1 as well as 
the individual worksheets. The summary of issues identified by the 
participants will serve as the basis for developing draft recovery 
strategies.
Develop Draft Strategies 
Strategies are inextricably tied to community-specific issues. The 
strategies provide detailed recommendations for activities that local 
departments, citizens and others could engage in to plan for long-term 
recovery. For example, if one of the issues that emerged from Session 1 is 
that “80% of businesses are located in the hazard zone”, then a 
corresponding strategy might be to “Identify locations outside of the 
hazard zone where businesses could relocate after a catastrophic 
disaster.” To be successful, strategies need to be more than an idea; they 
must be tangible activities attached to an individual or an organization 
with a defined outcome. 
Prior to Session 2, the Forum Team should fill out the strategy 
worksheet as completely as possible for each of the proposed strategies. 
This includes documenting identified issues in the rationale section, and 
brainstorming initial ideas for implementation. During Session 2, Forum 
participants will review the draft strategies and assist the Forum 
Organizing Team in completing the remainder of the worksheet 
components.
Develop Draft Strategies 
.
What’s involved?
Summarize Issues
Develop Draft Strategies
In addition to developing 
strategies from community-specifc 
issues, consider developing 
strategies that address the 
following:
Example Strategies
Creating an Oversight 
Committee that will champion 
recovery planning efforts within 
the community. This could be a 
new committee or a standing 
committee, such as the 
planning commission or natural 
hazard mitigation planning 
committee. It is important to 
appoint someone or an agency 
to be responsible for 
developing agendas and setting 
meeting schedules.
Writing and adopting a 
recovery ordinance that gives 
the city/county the authority to 
guide its own redevelopment. 
Developing an infrastructure 
recovery protocol that prioritizes 
which infrastructure gets back 
online first after a hazard event. 
page 20
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
background image
2
5
page 21 
.
Components of a Strategy Worksheet
Following are the key components of the recovery strategy 
worksheet. The intent of the worksheet is to assist communities in 
developing detailed strategies that clearly outline a process for 
implementation. See the “Resources” section at the end of this 
guide for a copy of the strategy worksheet.
.
In our experience, groups sometimes 
have difficulty switching gears from 
“What are our problems?” to “What do 
we do about them?” To try to avoid 
this difficulty, we suggest that the 
Forum Organizing Team summarize 
and analyze the findings from the issue 
identification exercise and draft a list 
of potential strategies. This way, 
community members are responsible 
for responding to the proposed 
strategies instead of trying to develop 
original ideas as a group.
One way to begin to summarize the 
issues is to start to categorize them 
into “like” groups. This allows you to 
move from a large number of 
individually identified issues to a more 
manageable number of issues.
To complete the rationale section of 
the strategy, use issues that were 
identified during Session 1 and any 
supporting information from the 
Community Profile, Hazard History, or 
Existing Plans, Policies, and Programs.
Develop a manageable number of 
strategies for your community. Lots of 
ideas are wonderful, but concrete ideas 
that can be implemented are even 
better!
Facilitator Ideas
Proposed Recovery Strategy:
 States the strategy. 
Theme Addressed: 
Indicates which theme (population, 
economy, or  land and development) the strategy addresses. 
Rationale:
 Describes the critical issues that the strategy 
will address. 
Ideas for Implementation:
 Describes how the 
strategy will be implemented locally. 
Coordinating Organization:
 Identifies the group that 
is willing and able to organize resources, find appropriate 
funding, and oversee activity implementation, monitoring, 
and evaluation. 
Partners:
 Identifies groups that may be able to assist in 
the implementation of strategies by providing relevant 
resources to the coordinating organization. 
Timeline:
 Identifies when the strategies should be 
implemented, either pre- or post-disaster. 
Task 5: Develop Draft Strategies
background image
2
6
.
Facilitate Forum Session 2 
During the strategy discussion, have 
a scribe take notes on an easel so 
that all participants can see what is 
being said.
Depending on the number of 
proposed strategies, the Forum 
Organizing Team might consider 
having multiple work sessions so 
that the group is reviewing a 
manageable number of strategies. 
This may help reduce the chance of 
participants getting burned out on 
reviewing strategies in one sitting. 
Introduction
At this time, explain the purpose and agenda of the meeting and 
summarize what was accomplished in Session 1 of the Forum. Present 
the list of consolidated issues from the previous session.
Review Draft Strategies 
During this exercise, Forum participants review and prioritize the draft 
strategies developed from the issues identified in Session 1. Depending 
on the number of people at this Session, form small groups of six to ten 
people, or remain in a large group. The facilitators should follow these 
steps to help the group prioritize the strategies:
1)  The group should review each strategy and decide if the strategy is 
appropriate for the community.
2)  Gather input from participants on: why the strategy is important for 
the community, how it could be implemented locally, and who would 
take the lead in implementing the strategy. 
3)  If the strategy is appropriate, each person should vote on a priority 
category (High, Medium, or Low) for each strategy. If people disagree 
within the group, the facilitator then leads a discussion about the 
placement of the strategy.
4)  Once all the strategies have been placed into categories, review their 
placement relative to each other. 
Next Steps
The Forum Team should inform participants about how their feedback 
will be used and where the planning process will go from here. This will 
be discussed more in Task 7.
Facilitator Ideas
Notes:
What’s involved?
Introduction
Review Draft Strategies
Next Steps
page 22
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
background image
2
7
Facilitator Ideas
Develop Workplan 
W
orkplans can be incorporated into 
the local natural hazards mitigation 
plan.
“The best result was creating 
momentum to do things and 
implement changes.”
  -Pilot 
Forum 
 
 
   
 
Participant
Develop Workplan
A
fter S
ession 2
 of the Forum, you should have a compilation of prioritized 
strategies. From these strategies, you can develop a workplan that clearly 
defines the tasks to be accomplished along with a timeline for completing 
the tasks. S
ome of the strategies identified in the Forum will be activities 
that can take place before a disaster event ever happens and others will be 
implemented soon after the event. D
eveloping this workplan can help lay 
out a “roadmap” for how and when the community begins to increase its 
disaster resilience. O
ne of the most important strategies of your workplan 
should be to form an O
versight C
ommittee that will champion recovery 
planning efforts within the community.
Discuss Strategies with Coordinating 
Organizations
D
uring S
ession 2
, Forum participants reviewed strategies and generated 
ideas for the appropriate coordinating organization. Members from the 
Forum O
rganizing Team should sit down with all identified coordinating 
organizations and discuss relevant strategies. This one-on-one contact 
facilitates greater understanding of the strategy and ensures that the 
coordinating organization supports the item. S
ecuring a letter of support 
from each coordinating organization would help illustrate the 
community’s commitment and capacity to implement those particular 
strategies. Local elected officials (city councils, county commissions, etc) 
should be kept up-to-date on all major recovery planning activities so that 
they are aware of these activites when something is req
uested of them.
Send Strategies to State/Province Emergency 
Management Agency
S
end strategies and work plans to the S
tate/P
rovincial E
mergency 
Management A
gency so that the state/province is informed of what local 
recovery needs will be when the event occurs. 
What’s involved?
Develop Workplan
Discuss Strategies with Coordinating 
Organizations
Share Strategies with State/Provincial 
Emergency Management Agencies
page 23 
Task 7: Develop Workplan
background image
Afterword
You have organized, facilitated and documented a post-disaster 
recovery forum for your community and identified a series of next 
steps to help make your community more disaster resistent. The 
work you have done so far has created a blueprint for 
implementing actions that are based on local needs and 
strategies.
Maintaining the momentum generated from the Forum will be 
important to ensure that the identified actions get implemented. 
Finding ways to incorporate post-disaster recovery into everyday 
community decisions will help keep this momentum going. 
Good Luck! 
Photos courtesy of FEMA
page 24
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
background image
Dear Sir or Madam: 
Please mark your calendars to attend the Cannon Beach Post-Disaster Recovery Forum on 
Thursday, March 2, 2006. As you may be aware this forum is an opportunity to: (1) assess 
current capacity to recover from a large-scale natural disaster event e.g. tsunami and (2) 
begin to develop strategies and/or logical steps to increase that capacity for post-disaster 
recovery. Your role will be to help identify issues and concerns for post-disaster recovery 
for the City of Cannon Beach. You have been invited because of your specific insight into 
the community. The input you provide will ensure that all facets of the community are 
represented during the forum process.
The Partners for Disaster Resilience (PDR) and the United States Geological Survey 
(USGS) will be facilitating the forum. Funding for the forum has been provided through a 
partnership with the Cascadia Region Earthquake Workgroup (CREW), United States 
Geological Survey (USGS), and University of Oregon’s PDR. PDR is a program within the 
Community Service Center at the University of Oregon. PDR strives to build the risk 
reduction capacity of local governments through collaboration, communication and coor-
dination to reduce the natural hazard risks that Oregon communities face. For more 
information, visit the PDR website: http://www.oregonshowcase.org 
A detailed informational forum packet will be sent two weeks prior to the forum. This 
informational packet will include:
  publication represents one possible scenario that may occur due to an  
  this publication highlights current knowledge, tools, and strategies for  
  post-disaster recovery.   
We look forward to meeting you at the Cannon Beach Post-Disaster Recovery Forum on 
Sincerely,
The Partnership for Disaster Resilience 
University of Oregon Community Service Center
Copyright © December 200
6
page 25 
Resources - Forum Invitation Letter 
Resources
background image
Resources - Issue Identification Worksheet 
Instructions: Identify specific response and recovery issues your community could face in the event of a disaster
in the left hand column below. For each issue, use the columns on the right hand side to check the potential
period of time each issue could affect the community. Check all that apply
Population 
Community Impacts Felt
(Check all that apply)
Framing Questions:
Where are the high population densities for residents? Are any in the inundation
zone?
Are there special-needs populations in the inundation zone? (Examples –
Elderly, disabled, minorities, children, and infants)
Where are there significant non-residential populations? (Examples –
Residents, Employees, Tourists)
o
h
2
7
-
0u
R
-
s
re
e
s
n
o
p
s
1
s
r
u
o
h
2
7m
o
h
t
n
e
Rs
n
o
ps
e
/
e
R
covery
o
h
t
n
o
m
1n
o
g
-i
g
n
e
v
o
c
e
Rr
y
page 26
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
The Partnership for Disaster Resilience
University of Oregon Community Service Center
Copyright © December 200
6
background image
Resources - Issue Identification Worksheet 
page 27
Instructions: Identify specific response and recovery issues your community could face in the event of a disaster 
in the left hand column below. For each issue, use the columns on the right hand side to check the potential
period of time each issue could affect the community. Check all that apply.
Economy
Community Impacts Felt
(Check all that apply)
Framing Questions:
Are businesses in the inundation zone? What types of businesses? Which ones
are location-dependent and which can be relocated?
What businesses represent significant components of your community’s
economy, in terms of employees, sales volume, or tax base?
Are alternate commercial spaces available if current stock is damaged?
o
h
2
7
-
0u
R
-
s
re
e
s
n
o
p
s
1
s
r
u
o
h
2
7m
o
h
t
n
e
Rs
n
o
ps
e
/
e
R
covery
o
h
t
n
o
m
1n
o
g
-i
g
n
e
v
o
c
e
Rr
y
Resources
The Partnership for Disaster Resilience
University of Oregon Community Service Center
Copyright © December 200
6
background image
Resources - Issue Identification Worksheet 
Instructions: Identify specific response and recovery issues your community could face in the event of a disaster 
in the left hand column below. For each issue, use the columns on the right hand side to check the potential
period of time each issue could affect the community. Check all that apply.
Land Use and Development 
Community Impacts Felt
(Check all that apply)
Framing Questions:
Do current development patterns or land use plans minimize development in the
inundation zone?
Is your community growing or projected to grow denser in the inundation zone?
Are there policies in place to address post-disaster redevelopment?
Is the community capable of providing temporary shelter and housing outside of
the inundation zone?
o
h
2
7
-
0u
R
-
s
re
e
s
n
o
p
s
1
s
r
u
o
h
2
7m
o
h
t
n
e
Rs
n
o
ps
e
/
e
R
covery
o
h
t
n
o
m
1n
o
g
-i
g
n
e
v
o
c
e
Rr
y
page 28
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
The Partnership for Disaster Resilience
University of Oregon Community Service Center
Copyright © December 200
6
background image
Resources - Strategy Worksheet Definitions 
The Partnership for Disaster Resilience 
University of Oregon Community Service Center
Copyright © December 200
6
Proposed Recovery Strategy:
Include a brief description of the proposed strategy.
Theme Addressed:
During the recovery forum, participants are asked to identify issues for the following three themes:
Population, Land Use and Development, and Economy. These checkboxes allow the proposed recovery 
strategies to be categorized by theme.
Rationale or Key Issues Addressed:
The rationale describes the critical issues that the strategy will address. It presents the logic and the fact
base behind the strategy: why is it important that this action be implemented? The findings from the
forum are a good source of rationale for proposed strategies.
Ideas for Implementation:
For each strategy, the form asks for some ideas for implementation, which serve as the starting point for
taking action. This information offers a transition from theory to practice. Ideas for implementation could
include: (1) collaboration with relevant organizations, (2) alignment with the community priority areas, and
(3) applications to new grant programs.
The ideas for implementation are just that: ideas. They do not necessarily prescribe the exact steps that the
community or its partners should take to implement a particular strategy. When an action is implemented,
more work will probably be needed to determine the exact course of action.
Coordinating Organization:
The coordinating organization is the public agency with authority to implement the identified strategy. It can
also be an agency that is willing and able to organize resources, find appropriate funding, or oversee
activity implementation, monitoring, and evaluation.
Internal Partners:
Internal partner organizations are departments within the community that may be able to assist in the
implementation of a strategy by providing relevant resources (time, budget, staff, data, etc.) to the
coordinating organization.
External Partners:
External partner organizations or jurisdictions can assist the community in implementing the strategies in
various functions. They may include local, regional, state, or federal agencies, as well as local and regional
public and private sector organizations.
Timeline:
Recovery strategies can be implemented at two different stages in the disaster cycle. They can be
implemented before the disaster happens to better prepare the community to address the impact of the
disaster. Strategies implemented in this timeline are considered pre-disaster strategies. Strategies can also be
implemented after the disaster occurs and will assist the community in the immediate recovery and
reconstruction phases. Strategies implemented in this timeline are considered post-disaster strategies.
page 29
Resources
background image
page 30
 
Post-Disaster Recovery Planning Forum: How-To Guide
Resources - Strategy Worksheet 
The Partnership for Disaster Resilience 
University of Oregon Community Service Center
Copyright © December 200
6
Proposed Recovery Strategy:
Theme Addressed:
Population
Land Use & Development
Economy
Rationale for Proposed Recovery Strategy:
Ideas for Implementation:
Coordinating Organization:
Internal Partners:
External Partners:
Timeline:
If available, estimated cost:
Pre-Disaster
Post-Disaster
Form Submitted by:
The form should include critical information on the rationale or fact base for the proposed strategy, ideas for
implementation, coordinating and partner organizations, timeline, and plan goals addressed. This approach,
developed by the University of Oregon’s Partnership for Disaster Resilience provides documentation of the 
proposed strategy and keeps together all of the essential information needed to implement the idea.