background image
1
Ambrym
Ambrym
Gaua
Gaua
Vanuatu volcano’s eruptions in 2009 
Coordination in non humanitarian 
/transition situation
Issues & challenges
Regional Pacific Humanitarian Team Workshop
Nadi, Fiji, 1-4 December 2009
Dr Bernard FABRE-TESTE              Vanuatu
fabretesteb@wpro.who.int
2
Presentation’s outline
Little countries – Enormous burden…
2009 Vanuatu major natural events 
Continuous volcanic activity - Impacts and needs
Ambrym history
Vanuatu response
Vanuatu appeal…
Outputs
Follow up…Lessons learnt…
Gaua - The issue of today and tomorrow
Conclusions – Questions & challenges
background image
2
3
Little countries – Enormous burden
Equivalent in Vietnam or in        
The Phlippines to around
Solomon's tsunami, 2007
50 deaths
10,000 deaths 
Samoa tsunami, 2009
150 deaths
120,000 deaths…
Vanuatu Gaua move phase 2 
600 people
200,000 people
Vanuatu Gaua evacuation phase 3
3,000 people
1,000,000 people 
Just compare… Just imagine
The 650 people dead or missing in the French Disaster of Malpasset
dam's break in 1959 just represent 5 deaths in equivalent for Solomon 
and 3 only for Vanuatu…
You can’t imagine what impact had this event in France, in Europe and 
worldwide at this time…
4
Vanua 
Vanua 
Lava
Lava
Gaua
Ambrym
Tongoa
2009 Vanuatu major 
natural events
• Ambrym eruption 
since December 2008
• Ambrym floods and 
lanslides the 15
th
April
• Tongoa earthquake 
the 29
th
May
• Gaua eruption since 
the 18
th
November   
background image
3
5
Ambrym
6
Continuous volcanic activity 
Impacts and needs (1)
Potential chronic human health impacts
respiratory problems
psychological stress
chemical impacts of gas or ash
chronic dental fluorosis / possibly skeletal fluorosis (Fluoride 
concentration in drinking water) 
Massive volcano eruption
mass displacement of population
comprehensive evacuation plan covering emergency humanitarian 
needs during evacuation period
medium/long term strategy to identify durable solution and recovery 
of livelihood. 
early warning activity is crucial by monitoring the volcanic activity 
and warning the population in timely manner
From a Vanuatu report on Tana & Ambrym volcanos, 2002
background image
4
7
The areas of priority humanitarian needs
Provision of safe water including technical assessment
Health intervention
Food/nutrition
Formulation of comprehensive evacuation plan and preparedness
Early warning including volcano monitoring
Public awareness
Volcanic and seismic technical assessment
Multisectoral assessment at early stage is crucial for defining  
comprehensive picture of risk and potential needs of affected 
population with specific focus on vulnerable population
Logistical support to the government is needed to facilitate 
assessment, coordination and response activities.
From a Vanuatu report on Tana & Ambrym volcanos, 2002
Continuous volcanic activity 
Impacts and needs (2)
8
Ambrym history
Long history of a live volcano …
1888, 1894-1895,1912-1929, 1950-1953, 1964-1966, 1981, 1988-1989… 2005, 2009
In 1913, destruction of Lonwolwol Hospital – 21 victims 
In 1929, partial evacuations 
In 1951, evacuation of the all population to nearby islands
In March 2005, extreme degassing with estimation of 20,000 tons of SO2 per day
---------------------------------------------
Dec 08 – new eruption started
Jan-Feb 09 observation by Geo-Hazards team (emissions of thick ash plumes to more 
than 2 km high on Jan 29th
)
But no effective attention /response from national level (Gov. side) to communities…
So, at end of Feb, alarming “rumours” started – but based on real issues with issue of 
acid rains and unsafe water supply consequence – agricultural products contamination -
health problems with in particular children missing school…
March 09, increase of activity intensity - Ambrym ejected >10,000 tons SO2 daily during 
from 16th to 20th march 
First quick campaign of G-H team confirmed acid rain ( when its pH is under 5.6) in 
most of the samples collected - 4,000 people living in western part are affected
3rd April – First donor meeting called by NDMO (Gov.) to present potential areas for 
external assistance - Decision of necessity of better assessment 
background image
5
9
“Initial situation / information”
Dark smoke and acid rain continue to overshadow Ambrym posing a 
threat to human lives. 
More than 9 000 people are affected particularly those living in 
Western part of Ambrym.
Before information concerning volcanic activity came from a based 
Research Team (ORSTOM, Noumea) but this team has left and there is 
no monitoring station at this time.
Reports are only from communities affected by acid rain.
No reported damages to infrastructure
Almost 95% of the population is dependent on rainwater collection or 
underground water as an alternative source of water which has been 
contaminated by acid rain. 
10
Government allocated funds for phase 1 operation including: 
Deployment of Rapid Technical Assessment multi-sectoral team
Community assessment and awareness program 
Possible fresh and clean water re-supply operation to fill all existing water 
wells and tanks in most affected communities 
Deployment of scientific teams 
Procurement of extra logistics supplies to be used during water re-supply 
operation 
Volcanic evacuation planning consultations at community, provincial and 
national levels 
Establish FOB EOC at West Ambrym
Plan a food supplementary supply strategy 
Maintain close consultations with partners and donor communities
Prepare international appeal to address immediate support 
Deploy communication support between worst affected areas such as 
Malampa Province and the National Government through NDC.
Vanuatu response (1) - Government
background image
6
11
Vanuatu response (2) - Community
Communities have been warned on the dangers of volcanic activities as well 
as the consequences of consuming water contaminated by acid rain and have 
received recommendations regarding food consumption. 
Monitoring and information between communities was ongoing at all times.    
The needs of special groups such as pregnant women, infants, elderly, and 
the disabled were constantly checked. 
Possible evacuation centers and the availability of resources are assessed. 
Malampa Provincial Councils conducted a preliminary assessment covering
the whole island. 
12
MOH (environmental unit) coordinated with NDMO, other government sectors 
and agencies, local and international health partners to assess the situation 
and provide timely and appropriate response.
WHO supported the deployment of a MOH team to Ambrym. 
UNICEF and UN OCHA are involved in assessment, response and 
coordination meetings with government agencies and rapidly organized a 
more comprehensive multi-sectoral assessment. 
Environmental health and water quality expertise (volcanic chemistry) (Mission 
of Pr Cronin supported by WHO) was setup to determine the level of volcanic 
health threat to the local population (West Ambrym, 2-6 May).
Vanuatu response (3) – MOH & UN
background image
7
13
Vanuatu Appeal
Coordinated and prepared by UNOCHA (Minako mission in Vanuatu)
Based on multi-sectoral assessment
Summary of response plan
Best-case scenario: volcano ceases activity – recovery situation after short term 
intervention…
Worst-case scenario: volcanic eruption             displacement  4,000 people
Sector
Response plan
Amount
WASH
Emergency assistance to vulnerable population affected in 
North and West Ambrym
USD 246,100
USD 5,027
WHO
Protection
Technical assistance for Evacuation Plan
USD 17,000
1. Food distribution for 2 month
USD 98,876
2. Supplementary food for specific groups for two months
UNICEF
1. Volcanic/Seismic technical assessment
USD 17,000
2. Volcano Monitoring
USD 86,000
3. Public Awareness
USD 10,000
Assessment
 Multi sectoral rapid assessment
USD 14,500
Logistics
Strengthening logistical capacity of the government
USD 10,000
Total
USD 504,503
Health
Scientific assessment of water quality
Food/Nutrition
Early Warning
14
Outputs …
Good start of political commitment, even a little late in timing…
Successful field-test of new revised assessment form (initiated by UNICEF)
Good multi-sectoral approach for the assessment process
Revitalisation of partnership within national and international stakeholders
Elaboration of tentative plans and budgets for the worst scenario case
Starting point of advocacy process for a stronger development partners 
mobilization for long term support (Particularly for costly monitoring plan)
Development of awareness and education/information process for 
communities regarding water supply and consumption 
Environmental health and water scientific assessment of the 2009 eruption 
consequences and comparative study with 2005 eruption data
A series of good recommendations in particular regarding the necessity 
to better and permanently monitor volcano activity nationwide
to strengthen emergency and disaster preparedness and put in actions 
all previous relevant recommendations of trainings and workshops
(WHO PHEMAP, Red Cross trainings, SOPAC workshops, etc.)
to develop a specific water supply plan and control for volcanic context
Demonstration of the needs to reinforce NDMO capacity (lack of human 
resources and means)
background image
8
15
Follow up… Lessons learned
The results of the assessment has shown that the situation was not so “serious”
than probably expected after initial rumours
The potential appeal lost its force - Demobilization (???)
Concurrence immediate of other events to occupy “key people” and us also…
Ambrym floods - Tongoa earthquake - H1N1 pandemic - Nationwide 
supplementary measles immunization integrated campaign
Political commitment is fragile
Intention is good and easy but real action is more difficult (allocation of money 
don’t mean immediate disbursement…) 
MOH still in its Health Reform process and the key PHEMAP recommendation 
(E&D Health Coordination unit) is still a dream…
Contingency planning workshop in September…
Experience of neighbour countries (Samoa) – Tsunami alert in October: the 
first time that population reacted (nearly) adequately…
Cost, difficulty and uncertainness of monitoring Volcano activity – when to take 
appropriate decision with major consequence such as a mass evacuation
Demand of national request, appeal to “officialise” international help
16
Gaua
The issue of today and tomorrow
Just to present the scene of this new problem…
background image
9
17
3 phases of operations activated by NDC:
Phase 1 - M&E - Information dissemination - Awareness - Planning
Phase 2 – Move of 600 people (400 from West part + 200 from 
Waterfall zone) within the island in East part 
Phase 3 - Evacuation whole population (3,000) to Vanua Lava Is.
Now
Now
Tomorrow ?
Tomorrow ?
18
Vanuatu means…
International support?                
How to mobilize partners?
Tomorrow…
in case of total evacuation
background image
10
19
Thankyu tumas
Thank you and Welcome to Vanuatu
WHO –
UNICEF –
UNOCH
A
 
UNDP –
U
N
F
P
A
 –
I
LO  
UNIFEM
AUSTRALIA – NEW ZEALAND – FRANCE – CHINA – EU – NEW CALEDONIA
NDMO – MOH – MOA – All GOV. VANUATU – RED CROSS 
(Vanuatu & France)
I
R
C
 –S
C
F
 –W
O
R
L
D
 V
I
S
I
O
N
 –P
E
A
C
E
 C
O
R
P
S
 –E
t
c
.