background image
Preliminary Report Regarding Coral Reef and GPS Measurements of Crustal 
Deformation Associated with the 2 April 2007 Gizo Great Earthquake 
 
Frederick W. Taylor 
Institute for Geophysics, The Jackson School of Geosciences 
The University of Texas at Austin 
Austin, Texas, U.S.A. 
 
Allison K. Papabatu 
Department of Mines, Energy and Water Resources 
Ministry of Natural Resources, Honiara, Solomon Islands 
 
With Participation by: 
Richard Briggs 
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences 
California Institute of Technology 
Pasadena, California, U.S.A. 
 
Abel Brown 
Department of Geosciences 
Ohio State University 
Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A. 
 
Abstract 
The 2 April 2007 earthquake, with an epicenter southeast of Gizo, ruptured several 
segments of the Solomon Islands arc convergent plate margin along the northern side of 
the San Cristobal-New Britain trench extending from near the southwest corner of 
Rendova Island until approximately the eastern end of Bougainville.  A zone of uplift 
parallels the trench and approximately overlies the seismic rupture zone. Parallel to and 
along the northern side of the uplift zone is a wider zone of subsidence.  Our observations 
of vertical movements from coral reefs and shorelines confirm a lack of uplift of southern 
Rendova and Tetepare. Instead, we found slight subsidence of southern Rendova and the 
eastern end of Tetepare. This indicates that the swath of uplift terminates somewhere 
west of Rendova. On this basis, we infer that rupture of the interplate thrust zone did not 
propagate from the epicenter eastward past Rendova and Tetepare Islands despite there 
being some aftershocks reported in this area.  This observation leads us to seriously 
consider the possibility that the sooner or later the interplate thrust zone beneath Rendova 
and Tetepare and farther eastward could rupture and produce a large thrusting earthquake 
and tsunami.  Furthermore it is also possible that failure of the interplate thrust zone on 
April 2 has increased stress on the fault farther east as may be indicated by slight 
subsidence of southern Rendova and western Tetepare.  An alternative interpretation of 
reduced seismic hazard for Rendova and Tetepare Islands could emerge if our GPS 
measurements on Rendova Island indicate that significant aseismic slip has occurred 
beneath Rendova Island over recent years or following the April 2 earthquake.  The 
possibility of a future Rendova-Tetepare earthquake is supported by the existence of 
fossil coral reefs on Rendova Island that document uplifts of 1-3 m during the past few 
 
1
background image
thousand years.  The last such event is dated by 
14
C at roughly 300 years ago.  This 
provides clear evidence that episodic uplifts have occurred in the past at Rendova and 
Tetepare Islands and that it is likely that these uplifts were seismic and could have 
generated large tsunamis.  Some large coral blocks on the shores of Tetepare could have 
been emplaced by such large tsunamis.  However, we do not predict that a large 
Rendova-Tetepare earthquake is imminent.  We can only say that such events have 
occurred and are certain to occur again sooner or later and that the 2 April event has the 
potential to accelerate the timetable for new events.  Ranongga also had large uplifts in 
the past similar to that of 2 April 2007.  However, because the interpolate thrust zone 
beneath Ranongga did rupture we believe that the potential for large thrusting 
earthquakes at Ranongga probably will be relatively low for the next few decades until 
more elastic energy accumulates in that area.  
 
Introduction 
On 2 April 2007 a “Great” earthquake occurred along the convergent plate boundary at 
the southern margin of the Solomon Islands arc with the epicenter located off the coasts 
of Gizo and Parara.  Great earthquakes are designated based on a Richter scale magnitude 
of  Ms > 8.0 and occur  on average only once every few years.  The earthquake rupture 
propagated westward past Ranongga and the Shortlands and terminated near the eastern 
end of Bougainville.  This rupture crossed Simbo Ridge, a transform fault system, 
separating the Australian and Solomon Sea Plates.  Thus, the earthquake involved 
coseismic slip of both the Australian and Solomon Sea Plates, which have different 
convergence rates and directions relative to the Solomon islands.  Convergence rates of 
the Australian plate at the New Georgia Group are ~ 100 mm/yr toward ~N75º W while 
the Solomon Sea Plate converges with the area farther west at a rate of ~130 mm/yr in a 
direction nearly perpendicular to the arc trend.  These very rapid tectonic plate 
convergence rates have the potential to generate numerous shallow subduction zone 
earthquakes if interaction between the Solomon arc and the subducting plate involves a 
component of unstable slip that leads to cycles of elastic energy accumulation and release 
as earthquakes.   
 
Background 
This particular earthquake was unexpected in the sense that the Solomons arc from 
approximately Ranongga to the region of Nggatokae has no recorded history of large 
shallow subduction zone earthquakes such as occurred on 2 April.  It has been suggested 
that the relative youth and high temperature of the Woodlark Basin crust would not allow 
brittle failure and seismic slip.  On the other hand, the low rates of seismicity along the 
New Georgia arc sector could be taken as an ominous warning that plate convergence is 
being stored as elastic energy rather than being released continuously as numerous small 
earthquakes.  It appears that the latter interpretation may be closer to the truth.  In any 
case, the New Georgia Group is tectonically very active with Holocene uplift rates on 
Tetepare, Rendova, and Ranongga exceeding 6 mm/yr in some areas. The tectonic uplift 
is attributed to strong interaction of the Woodlark Basin seafloor with the base of the arc 
as it subducts because the Woodlark sea floor resists being pushed beneath the Solomons 
arc.  The Woodlark lithosphere is actively forming at seafloor spreading centers offshore 
from New Georgia and is thus extremely young and buoyant so that it does not readily 
 
2
background image
sink into the mantle at the subduction zone.  In addition, the Woodlark Basin sea floor is 
very rugged and studded with topographically prominent structures such as the Simbo 
Ridge and Coleman Seamount, a volcanic edifice rising ~3000 m above the surrounding 
sea floor. The outer flanks of Coleman are presently thrusting beneath the arc just 20 km 
off the south coast of Rendova and may significantly resist subduction with consequent 
deformation of the outer arc revealed by extremely rapid uplift of southern Rendova and 
Tetepare Islands.  Subduction of the Simbo Ridge is the likely cause of the particularly 
rapid uplift of Ranongga. 
 
The extremely active tectonics of the New Georgia Group Islands led us to map Holocene 
uplift rates (Mann et al., 1998; Taylor et al., 2005) and to install a sparse network of 
seven GPS sites in the area in 1997 sites installed in Western Province with the assistance 
of the Department of Mines, Energy and Water Resources.   We re-measured that 
network in 1998 and 2001 to obtain basic plate (Phillips, 2004).  Thus, following the 2 
April 2007 event, we possessed baseline studies that enable us to measure total 
movement on all seven GPS sites since 2001 that will include the coseismic 
displacements which are expected to include several meters of horizontal dislocation as 
well as the several meters of obvious uplift reported on Ranongga Island. 
 
Preliminary work on Ranongga, Rendova, and Tetepare Islands indicates that uplift is 
accomplished in steps as great as several meters each.  Corals that were uplifted and 
killed by some of these events have been identified and dated by radiocarbon, especially 
on Fearo Island and nearby on Rendova.  For that area we identified at least four recent 
uplifts with the most recent one about 300 years ago.  The past four large uplifts appear to 
have occurred within the past 2000 years or so.  However, this is not a complete history.  
First, the dating should be done by a more accurate method using 
230
Th/
234
U because 
radiocarbon errors are too large.  Second, the geographic extent of these uplifts is not 
known so Tetepare may have a distinct uplift history from Rendova.  Third, there may be 
earthquakes and vertical movements of other types that do not create the larger 1-3 m 
steps that we have seen in the record of uplifted corals.  However, the uplifted corals do 
document the fact that Tetepare, Rendova, and Ranongga have undergone repeated large 
uplifts that were most likely accompanied large earthquakes and that such events are 
certain to occur again in the future sooner or later. 
 
Measurements of Deformation Associated with the 2 April 2007 Event 
Within eight days of the earthquake we had secured a small amount of funding from the 
Jackson School of Geosciences of the University of Texas at Austin to conduct a quick 
response study of crustal deformation associated with the Gizo earthquake.  Dr. Kerry 
Sieh of the California Institute of Technology sent Dr. Richard Briggs to assist with 
measurements of coral reefs from which we can determine vertical displacements.  Dr. 
Michael Bevis of Ohio State University sent his student, Abel Brown, with seven GPS 
receivers to occupy our seven GPS.  This includes one GPS receiver that will remain 
indefinitely at the World Fish Center at Nusatupe Island near Gizo to serve as a 
continuous GPS station that will, among other benefits, continue to measure ongoing 
crustal strain as the Earth adjusts to this large earthquake.   
 
 
3
background image
We began deploying the GPS receivers on 18 April and all were functioning by 23 April.  
The GPS sites are located on Simbo, the southern tip of Ranongga, at Saboro on 
southeastern Vella Lavella, Nusatupe Island next to Gizo, at Munda airport, at Husuzu on 
mid-eastern Rendova, and at Rava Point across the Balfour Channel from Tetepare.  The 
GPS receivers (except Nusatupe) were removed on 8 and 10 May and will be returned to 
the United States.   
 
In addition, we also made precise measurements of emerged coral colonies and other 
features that will provide a quantitative assessment of the vertical deformation, both 
uplift and subsidence. We made coral measurements GPS sites and circumnavigated 
Tetepare, Rendova, and Parara and examined much of the coasts of other islands 
including New Georgia, Kohinggo, Kolambangora, and Vella Lavella as well as many 
smaller islands.  We were unable to get out to the Shortlands to evaluate vertical motions 
in that region. 
 
 The GPS data require processing before they can be interpreted and some adjustments 
based on tide models will be applied to the coral measurements.  However, the coral data 
are sufficient to reveal some important aspects of the earthquake.  The uplifted region is 
the most important for later use in modeling the earthquake parameters.   
 
Results 
In general, the area on the northern side of the convergent plate boundary, or trench, is 
expected to be uplifted by a thrust-type subduction zone earthquake.  Indeed, we found 
that uplift occurred on much of Parara, the reefs extending from the end of Parara toward 
Gizo, the southern half of Gizo, all of Ranongga and areas extending into the southern 
part of Vella Lavella until approximately Liapari on the east are uplifted.  The most 
spectacular uplift is on Ranongga, probably because it is the so close to the convergent 
plate boundary and because it is being underthrust by the prominent Simbo Ridge.  Thus, 
the boundary between uplift and subsidence extends through the northern Vona Vona 
Lagoon, through the reefs between the end of Parara and Gizo, through Gizo and over 
through southern Vella Lavella and onward to the west parallel to the arc trend where it 
lies beneath sea level and can not be mapped. 
 
We also detected what we expect to confirm as slight uplift of the southwestern corner of 
Rendova including the village of Hopongo.  However, uplift clearly does not significantly 
affect either Rendova or Tetepare Islands.  Instead, much of the south coast of Rendova 
appears to have subsided slightly as did the westernmost few km of Tetepare.  The rest of 
Tetepare appears to be unaffected by vertical deformation.  However, most of the west 
coast of Rendova has subsided even where it is on the same trend as the uplifted parts of 
Parara.  We interpret this to indicate that the seismic rupture did not propagate eastward 
beneath Rendova and Tetepara.  Subsidence of the northern and western parts of Rendova 
are expected because of their proximity to the uplifted sea floor offshore and onshore 
southern Parara even though most of southern Rendova did not uplift. 
 
On the northern side of the uplifted zone is a broad area of subsidence that we have not 
mapped in great detail due to time constraints.  Moreover, the geographic pattern of 
 
4
background image
subsidence is less critical to understanding the event than is the uplift.  However, it does 
appear that subsidence of more than 0.5 m has affected large areas.  We will have better 
estimates of subsidence once our colleagues provide tidal adjustments for our 
measurements of depths of living corals below water level. 
 
Summary 
Critical early measurements of the crustal deformation in the New Georgia Group 
associated with the 2 April 2007 earthquake show that the rupture zone extends from near 
the southwest corner of Rendova through Gizo and Ranongga toward Bougainville.  The 
area overlying the rupture zone underwent coseismic uplift on April 2.  However, the 
rupture zone does not extend eastward beneath Rendova and Tetepare Islands.  The 
southern coast of Rendova and the western end of Tetepare appear to have subsided.  
This could denote increased stress on this part of the convergent plate boundary which 
potentially increases the likelihood of a future earthquake on the interpolate thrust fault 
underlying Rendova and Tetepare.  It also is possible that aseismic slip occurred beneath 
Rendova and Tetepare Islands and may have relieved stress and delayed the time of a 
future earthquake.  Our GPS measurements on Rendova may reveal whether stress was 
relieved or if it increased following the 2 April 2007 event.  We will report on this as 
soon as possible. 
 
We know from previous work that Rendova and Tetepare have undergone episodic 
uplifts of 1 to 3 m each that may have been accompanied by tsunamis.  We see this 
evidence in the form of emerged coral reefs and blocks of coral that appear to have been 
thrown on shore Tetepare by large waves.  Such events are certain to happen in the 
future.  However, the question is whether such future events are in the distant or the near 
future.  At this point we simply do not know. 
 
We also know from previous work that Ranongga had undergone large uplift events in 
the past and that its uplift rate is very rapid.  The large amount of uplift of Ranongga on 2 
April 2007 probably has consumed the stored elastic energy beneath the Gizo-Ranongga 
area and thus has reduced the potential for another large earthquake over the next few 
decades or longer. 
 
The most important thing that we can now do to advance our understanding of future 
seismic risk in the Western Solomon Islands is to document the paleo-earthquake history 
of the New Georgia Group, and the Shortlands as well.  This will allow us to understand 
the relationship between the present event and past events on Rendova, Tetepare, and 
Ranongga.  For example, did the 2 April event cause uplift similar to that of previous 
uplifts of Ranongga?  When in the past did Ranongga undergo uplift?  Exactly when in 
the past have Tetepare and Rendova undergone?  This would give us some idea of when a 
future earthquake and uplift might occur.  We also need to determine the characteristic 
tectonic blocks that undergo rupture as units or groups of units in Western Province.  For 
example, does Rendova Island have an uplift history distinct from Tetepare or do they 
uplift at the same time?  Knowing this would help us to estimate the size of earthquakes 
and their potential hazard in the case of future events.  Our goal is to organize a research 
project that would answer these questions while also contributing to our understanding of 
 
5
background image
the relationships between subduction zone earthquakes, and the mechanisms that cause 
tectonic deformation of the Solomons arc and other arc systems. 
 
 
 
 
6