
ISDR Asia Partnership
Overview of
Regional Stocktaking and
Mapping of Disaster Risk Reduction
Interventions in Asia and the Pacific
Initiative of the ISDR Asia Partnership
Supported by the Asian Development Bank under a Regional TA
February 2009- June 2010
Presentation at Workshop on
Review of Initiatives on Hazard, Vulnerability and Risk Assessment
ISDR Asia Partnership
Background
At the September 2007 meeting of the IAP,
Stocktaking was identified
by the IAP members as one of the 8 priority functions
At the 2
nd
Meeting of the Expanded IAP held during the 2
nd
Ministerial
Meeting, November 2007 in New Delhi, a
Working Group was
established for the initiative
and ADB expressed interest to support it.
Concept note prepared by UN/ISDR with inputs from IAP members and
submitted to ADB.
Project started from February 2009
Reporting on this at IAP meeting, September, 2008, Kuala Lumpur and
March 2009, Bangkok

ISDR Asia Partnership
Regional Stocktaking and Mapping of
DRR Interventions would
contribute
to:
– Improved
regional planning and
programming
on DRR
– Highlight
areas of cooperation
among
regional and sub-regional organisations
– Add to the
periodic progress reviews and
reporting processes
at regional and sub-
regional levels
– Assist
donors and decision-makers to channel
resources and efforts
that can meet their own
policy and programmatic imperatives
Why IAP?
• IAP acts as the
inter-agency
forum supporting the
functions
of the Asia
Regional Platform on DRR
• As a
regional coordination
mechanism
is an
appropriate vehicle to assist
coherent regional strategy
setting, and programming
and progress reviews
through improved
information exchange.
Importance of this IAP initiative
ISDR Asia Partnership
Expected Outputs
Develop work plan for
information collection
from various regional
agencies
Prepare a
data collection
template
on DRR intervention
to obtain information from
wider stakeholders
Regional Stock take
;
Document on DRR
interventions in all sub
regions of Asia and
Pacific
Identify and
review
available sources
and
information on hazards,
vulnerability and risks
Based on collated
information an
analytical
overview of the regional risk
patterns
would be prepared
highlighting potential
information gap
Inventory of Risk
Assessment
describing
the wider context in which
regional initiatives are
undertaken
Develop a
template for
an interactive
knowledge map
to
update information
On-line tool to collect &
reflect the information
collated on hazard and
vulnerability information and
regional DRR initiatives.
Maps
and charts
to present the
analysis
Interactive Knowledge
Maps
linked to web sites
such as Prevention Web and
with a regular update
strategy
1
2
3

ISDR Asia Partnership
Beneficiaries
The primary beneficiaries of the
initiative will be:
– National DRR stakeholders
;
national governments, UN
agencies, research institutions,
universities, private sector and
donor agencies
– Regional stakeholders
in DRR
such UN Agencies, inter-
governmental organizations,
research and technical
organizations, NGOS and in
particular the IAP members
Results of the project will help in
enhanced regional planning,
programming and cooperation
.
Will benefit by receiving more
coherent regional assistance and
greater clarity on the type of support
that may be able to access from the
regional level to achieve their DRR
goal
ISDR Asia Partnership
It would help the countries and stakeholders in knowing:
– Who are the
partners
involved in DRR?
– What are they working on (
Thematically
)?
– Where are they working (
Geographical coverage
)?
– Which
geographical areas needs more level of intervention
considering its
level of risk?
– Which thematic area should receive more focus?
– Which all
initiatives
from other sub-regions
we could learn from
?
– In
which geographical area more financial resources
are being put in? Where
not?
– In
which thematic area there is more partners involved
? Which all needs
stronger partnership?
– In
which area (geographical/thematic) we can partner
with others to scale up?
Importance of this IAP initiative

ISDR Asia Partnership
Framework
The analytical
framework of the
stocktaking will be
guided by the HFA
and its 5 priorities for
action and by the
Indicators
as in the
HFA Monitor
ISDR Asia Partnership
Methodology-Building on past efforts
Stocktaking and Mapping
initiatives are
NOT NEW
to
Asia or Pacific
This project will build on these efforts
and learn from their strengths and
shortcomings
Past and ongoing efforts on
Risk Assessment
1.Global Risk Identification Programme
(GRIP)
2.DesInventar
in 5 Asian Countries by UNDP
3.Risk Assessment Analysis for Asia Pacific
by
UNOCHA
4.Disaster events database
by ASEAN
5.Hazard and Vulnerability Atlas
by Pacific
Disaster Center
Past and ongoing initiative on
stocktaking
and databases
1.Pacific Disaster Net
(SOPAC)
2.Overview of DRR in Asia and Pacific
(ISDR, ADPC and ADRC)
3.IRP Database
4.CBDRM Database
(ADPC)
5.Prevention Web
(ISDR system)
6.WWW, Indonesia
(UNDP)
Principles for
data collection
– Broad and inclusive
overview of the
information on DRR and related
initiatives
– Recording of information in
neutral and
uncontroversial
manner
– Building on and adding to the existing
stocktaking and mapping initiatives
– Adopting a
user friendly approach
to
encourage participation for information
sharing and access
– Development of a sustainable tool
which will serve to update information
periodically in the region
– Focus on regional initiatives

ISDR Asia Partnership
Implementation mechanism
-
Regional Stocking and Mapping is being
implemented under the
auspices of the IAP
and the Asian Regional Platform
-Implementation is guided by a
Project Steering Committee
comprised
of the members from IAP working group on
regional stocktaking and mapping ; ADB,
ADPC, ADRC, IFRC, OCHA , UNDP, UN/ISDR,
WB, SOPAC
-Project steering committee is
chaired by
UN/ISDR
-Working under the close guidance of the
IAP,
ADPC as a technical agency is the
executing agency on behalf of the IAP
-
ADPC is working with ISDR Regional Office
with weekly meeting between the both
-
ADB will monitor the activities
through
regular progress reports
Purpose of PSC
•
Overall guidance, technical and
advisory support to the EA;
•
Monitoring project implementation
and progress;
•
Taking decisions on project direction;
•
Sharing progress reports and results
with the wider IAP;
•
Establishing linkages with information
providers and other key stakeholders
that need to be involved;
•
Contribute own information to the
stocktaking initiative; and
•
Capture and disseminate lessons
learned.
ISDR Asia Partnership
Implementation mechanism
•
1
st
Meeting of the PSC
Meeting held on
30
th
of April, 2009 in Bangkok
•
Meeting chaired by UN/ISDR and
attended by ADB, ADPC, ADRC, IFRC,
SOPAC, UN/ISDR and UNOCHA
•
ToR of the PSC
finalized
•
Meeting reported the progress till date
and inputs on implementation plan
ToR of PSC
•
Attached as the annex to the ToR of
IAP Working Group on Stocktaking
and Mapping and responsible for
guiding implementation of this
particular initiative of the IAP
•
Confirms the membership of PSC
namely; ADB, ADPC, ADRC, IFRC,
SOPAC, UN/ISDR, UN/OCHA, UNDP
and WB
•
Purpose of PSC, Secretariat and
Frequency of Meeting
•
Tenure- February 2009-July 2010

ISDR Asia Partnership
• Long term tool
– Identify
gaps in DRR
(geographic and thematic)
– Program synergy
in national and provincial programs
– Harmonized work plans
at the Regional and National (?) level
• Interactive knowledge map (long term tool) owned and
maintained by ISDR System in Asia Pacific
• Continued hosting and maintenance by Prevention web
(ISDR), UNESCAP, UNDP BCPR, ADRC, ADPC, UNOCHA, SOPAC
• Presentation and utilization by Regional Meetings for reporting
and periodic work plans; AMCDRR, IAP, UNESCAP, RCC, ACDR
System Monitoring and Sustainability
Key considerations for successful implementation of
the initiative
•
Regional stocktaking and inventory of risk profile is
meant to
support the National systems
•
Though the focus is on Regional Actors, this should
be
linked to the national system
•
In the long run
effective National risk profile and
stocktaking is the key
•
Current resources do not permit focus at the
national level. Subsequent phases can look into
national level.
•
Should feed into the
Global and Regional
Assessment Report/s