background image
 
 
C o m m u n i t y   r i s k   r e d u c t i o n  
 
 
Containing menaces old and 
new 
 
Reducing the risks that natural hazards 
bring is a Red Cross/Red Crescent priority 
around the world and something National 
Societies are uniquely placed to pursue 
because of their widespread presence at 
the community level. 
 
Of course, community-based disaster 
reduction (CBDR) is about more than 
climate change. But whether measures are 
aimed at climate-related hazards or 
earthquakes, or tsunamis, or volcanic 
eruptions, is immaterial. Steps taken to 
contain an older menace can help contain 
new or increasing ones for which extreme 
weather or warming are responsible. 
 
It was not climate change that caused the 
Viet Nam Red Cross to start planting 
mangrove trees along the seashore in 
1994. Deforestation had robbed large 
coastal tracts of the mangrove they once 
had and exposed coastal inhabitants to the 
ravages of typhoons and storms. But as 
sea temperatures and levels rise, more 
severe meteorological hazards can be 
expected and the natural defences restored 
by crucial community effort are more 
important than ever. 
 
“It isn’t that climate change alters the 
nature of our risk-reduction activities,” says 
Viet Nam Red Cross senior officer, Nguyen 
Hung Thang, “but it does raise matters of 
priority, particularly at the community level.” 
 
Ways to diminish the dangers 
 
In 2008, some 213 million people were 
affected by natural disasters, and most 
disasters are increasing in number and 
intensity. 
 
People’s options are limited. They can run. 
They can wait in despair for the worst to 
happen. Or they can reduce the impact of 
what is likely to happen, as Bangladesh 
Red Crescent volunteers are showing 
villagers in the low-lying, flood-prone 
northern plains of their country. Already 
monsoon rains bring heavy floods and they 
could become bigger and more frequent as 
climate changes. The steps the volunteers 
advocate may seem modest at first but in 
community terms are hugely significant. 
 
Planting trees along river banks and 
roadsides can help check the force of the 
flooding, help to improve the environment, 
and help a community not only to survive 
but develop. 
 
The root spread stabilizes the earth and 
helps prevent the erosion of topsoil, and 
trees provide sustainable income. When 
mature, they are felled and replaced by 
fresh saplings, the wood being sold to 
enhance community coffers. Most 
importantly, though, villages are less open 
to disaster, more resilient, better able to 
cope with adversity.  
 
Across the country, Red Crescent 
programmes are benefiting village after 
village, varying according to community 
needs. All of them come with a message: 
no matter where you are and how huge the 
hazards, there are always ways to diminish 
their menace. 
 
Preparing for the unexpected 
 
The Nicaraguan Red Cross has promoted 
preparation for the unexpected since the 
start of its climate change programme. The 
wisdom of this was seen when 2007’s 
Hurricane Felix scythed its way through the 
Mosquito Coast. After Hurricane Dean, it 
was the region’s second Category-5 storm 
in less than a month – the first time on 
record that two of that force had made 
landfall in a single hurricane season.  
 
Severe storms have hit the country 
frequently over the past decade and the 
National Society is helping communities 
face up to the clearly increasing threats.  
 
The Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment 
(VCA, see below) – a method by which 
                                 
 
 
background image
 
 
communities themselves can assess and 
address the hazards they face – has been 
of enormous assistance. Having mapped 
the dangers, people analyse why they are 
vulnerable to them. Then they develop 
action plans. VCAs in Nicaragua have led 
to self-organization, with communities 
aware not only of how to deal with storms 
but other hazards they encounter. 
 
How to integrate climate 
change 
 
Helping communities reduce their own 
vulnerability is more urgent than ever. That 
does not mean telling them what to do but 
facilitating a dialogue about their concerns, 
empowering them to define their own 
priorities. 
 
A key guiding principle should be to keep it 
simple
. All you may need to do is ask 
people if they have noticed unusual 
weather, briefly explain why climate is 
changing globally, and help them decide on 
local responses. 
 
Keeping it simple is even more important 
because a key challenge with CBDR is to 
reach a large number of communities. The 
approach must be simple enough to be 
applied by our local volunteers in ways 
communities can understand. 
 
Step 1: Collecting and analysing general 
background information 
See Getting Started ‘How to’ section. 
 
Step 2: Assessing priorities 
Using the background information 
gathered, assess priority areas to work on 
within the National Society’s overall 
disaster-management context (see 
Disaster Management ‘How to’ section, 
Steps 1 and 2
).  
 
The prioritization should be guided by, 
among other things, the way climate 
change is affecting particular parts of the 
country. 
 
Step 3: Conducting VCAs 
Integrating climate change into VCAs can 
be done very simply. The team preparing 
the VCA should decide beforehand how 
basic or complex the integration of climate 
change should be. Below are three options 
to choose from: 
 
OPTION A (BASIC): Getting additional 
information 
from the community 
Make sure the VCA asks the right 
questions to get information about unusual 
climate phenomena and trends. Consider a 
number of VCA tools that examine trends, 
particularly: 
o
  Seasonal calendar. Ask whether 
seasons have been changing. 
o
  Historical calendar. Ask about 
systematic changes in temperature, 
rainfall and other weather events; and 
occurrences of “strange” phenomena. 
o
  Risk map (or transect walk). Ask people 
to describe not only the current situation 
but also how it has been changing. 
o
  Questionnaires and focus group 
discussions. Add special questions 
such as, “How did that weather affect 
you, your family and your community?” 
 
OPTION A + B (INTERMEDIATE): 
Briefing VCA facilitators on climate 
change 
Ensure that facilitators are familiar with 
climate change concepts, this could include 
use of video resources, a climate expert or 
integrating it into training manuals. Using 
this option facilitators aren’t expected to 
explain climate change to communities.  
 
OPTION A + B + C (ADVANCED): 
Bringing the knowledge to communities 
Through careful training, facilitators must 
feel confident in explaining the concept of 
climate change and relating it to the 
community’s context. The important part is 
to be careful not to over-emphasise climate 
change. The aim is for communities to 
understand that the risks are changing and 
that they can take action to reduce the risks 
they face.  
 
Analysing the results of VCA’s 
The team should analyse the community’s 
information, particularly documenting the 
way they have described new risks or 
trends in weather patterns. Compare 
community observations with the scientific 
                                 
 
 
background image
 
 
information from your society’s national 
climate-risk assessment. Assess whether 
risk-reduction strategies identified in the 
VCA will improve resilience to climate 
change trends suggested by scientific 
reports.  
 
Step 4: Implementing CBDR 
The VCA may already have resulted in 
enhanced awareness and disaster risk 
reduction by the communities themselves. 
It may also help plan further Red 
Cross/Red Crescent material assistance – 
such as communication equipment or 
provision of seedlings for reforestation – or 
improved community processes, such as 
plans for disaster management. Follow-up 
may involve partnership with NGOs and 
local government, and advocacy regarding 
local and national policies, for instance on 
evacuation shelters or building codes. 
 
Step 5: Evaluation 
Risks are continuously changing so it is 
important to evaluate the National Society’s 
CBDR programmes regularly. Evaluation 
should be a continuous process.   
o
  If new threats or diseases have 
occurred, there may be a need to 
update the priorities. 
o
  VCA information has a special role. 
Local communities may report changing 
risks that no one else has picked up. 
o
  Return regularly to assessed 
communities to check on follow-up and 
maintain a dialogue on risks. 
o
  Document information on VCAs as well 
as the experiences from actual CBDR 
programmes. The more such examples 
are shared, the faster we can expand 
our coverage. 
 
Find the complete modules in the Red 
Cross/Red Crescent Climate Guide, 
www.climatecentre.org
. Main source of 
general information on CBDR and VCAs is 
the International Federation’s website, 
www.ifrc.org
.  
 
“It isn’t that climate change alters the 
nature of our risk-reduction activities but it 
does raise matters of priority.”, Nguyen 
Hung Thang, Viet Nam 
 
                                 
 
 

Document Outline