background image
http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900sid/MUMA-7WG8RR?OpenDocument&rc=5&emid=TS-2009-000209-ASM
 
Natural disasters: Thinking beyond immediate response 
Source: Brookings-Bern Project on Internal Displacement 
Date: 02 Oct 2009 
Tsunami in Samoa, massive flooding in Manila, earthquake in Sumatra – if you think there 
are more catastrophic acts of nature these days, you're right. In fact, the number of natural 
disasters has doubled in the past twenty years. Last year some 400 natural disasters 
affected over 200 million people, killing 16,000 people and displacing close to 50 million 
from their homes. Natural disasters affect both rich and poor countries; while they 
generally produce higher economic losses in developed countries, casualties are higher in 
developing ones. And scientists tell us that disasters, particularly hydrometerological 
disasters – flooding, cyclones, hurricanes, etc. – are likely to increase in both frequency 
and severity as a result of climate change.  
The international system has a well-developed capacity to respond quickly to major 
disasters – to dispatch aircraft packed with food and water and to mobilize teams of 
doctors, rescue equipment, and sniffer dogs. But this takes time. Most of the lives saved in 
the immediate aftermath of a disaster are the result of local action – of neighbours pawing 
through rubble to rescue trapped earthquake victims, of local churches and mosques 
setting up systems to distribute food, of families opening up their homes to people whose 
houses are now under water. While most Western media attention focuses on the 
international response, much more should be done to support local communities to 
respond to disasters. More importantly, more should be done to support their efforts to 
reduce the risks of natural disasters.  
Communities may not be able to prevent torrential floods or hurricanes, but there are 
clearly steps they can take to reduce the impact of such disasters on their communities. 
Compare the response of the Cuban and Haitian governments to the four devastating 
hurricanes that hit their countries last year: while 2 million Cubans were affected by the 
hurricanes, there were only 7 deaths. In Haiti, there were 423 deaths reported among the 
800,000 people affected by the storms. The Cuban disaster response system is one of the 
strongest in the world, with early warning systems which reach deep into communities and 
evacuation plans in which local officials ensure that the most vulnerable members of 
communities are evacuated to safety. Hurricane awareness programs are mandatory in 
schools and citizens are taught how to board up their homes before leaving for shelters.  
Mobilizing funds to support victims of natural disasters—at least the big natural disasters 
which make headlines in Western countries—is usually easier than raising money for long-
term actions to prevent large-scale casualties. Some relief agencies have adopted policies 
that 10 percent (or more) of the funds they raise to respond to disasters will be dedicated 
to risk reduction—this is a good initiative which should become standard practice and 
communicated clearly to individual donors.  
Reducing the risks of natural disasters saves lives as surely as sending in relief supplies 
after disaster has struck. Even as the international community springs into reaction to 
respond to these recent devastating disasters, we should be preparing for the disasters to 
come and planning on how to reduce their human casualties. The disasters will come. It's 
time to take disaster risk reduction seriously.