background image
 
 
 
 
 
Coastal Infrastructure Management Plan 
 
 
Salega District 
  
 
 
Implementation Guidelines 
 
 
 
June 2002 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
 
 
 
Table of Contents 
Introduction to the CIM Plan 
Implementation Guidelines 
Participants in the Plan 
ii 
Salega District Infrastructure 
Fagafau Village Infrastructure 
Samata Village Infrastructure 
Fogatuli Village Infrastructure 
Fai’a’ai Village Infrastructure 
11 
Vaipua Village Infrastructure 
13 
Fogasavaii Village Infrastructure 
15 
Sagone Village Infrastructure 
17 
G l o s s a r y  
Coastal Hazard Zones
 – 
Defined areas landward of the coast which are or are considered likely to be subject to the effects of hazards 
over a defined assessment period. In this study, reference is made to four coastal hazard zones: ASCHs (areas 
sensitive to coastal hazards); CEHZs (coastal erosion hazard zones); CFHZs (coastal flood hazard zones) and 
CLHZs (coastal landslip hazard zones). 
“Do Minimum” option -  
A Management option that involves continuing with the present maintenance and upgrading programme on 
an as and when required basis. 
Hazard -  
A source of potential harm or a situation with a potential to cause loss. 
Infrastructure
 –  
Built structures and networks which support the national, regional or local community. 
Lifeline infrastructure
  
Infrastructure that contributes directly to the survival of the community and its ability to respond and 
recover at the time of extreme events. 
Secondary infrastructure
  
Infrastructure that contributes to the every-day development of the community. 
Implementation Guidelines
 –  A document to guide land use and resource practices to achieve specified goals, objectives and policies and 
provide a framework for the implementation of defences and works. 
Issue
 –  
A specific concern regarding both cause and effect. 
Land and Resource Use
 –  
The use of land and resources by the community for social, economic or other benefit (e.g. land use includes 
areas used for villages or crops, resource use includes activities such as sand mining, gravel extraction or 
fishing). 
Monitoring
 –  
Process of measuring the effectiveness or impacts of projects and works against predicted standards, levels or 
outcomes. 
Resilience
 -  
The ability to be adaptive, responsive and quick to recover. 
Community Resilience
 –  
The ability for the community to be adaptive, responsive and quick to recover from the adverse effects 
of hazard. 
Natural Resilience
 –  
The ability of natural systems to be adaptive, responsive and quick to recover from coastal processes 
or hazards. 
Risk
 –  
The chance of something happening that will have an impact on objectives.  It is measured in terms of 
consequence and likelihood.  In the Coastal Infrastructure Management Plan context it is the likelihood that 
infrastructure will be subject to coastal hazards and the potential for loss of property, life or land due to 
natural processes. 
Stakeholders -  
Those people and organisations who may affect, be affected by, or perceive themselves to be affected by, a 
decision or activity.  The term stakeholder may also include interested parties. 
Strategy
 –  
Direction or course of action to achieve a defined vision. 
Susceptibility
 -  
The degree to which infrastructure at risk is likely to be damaged by coastal hazards and how easy/difficult, 
expensive/cheap it is to replace.  In the context of the CIM Plan the term susceptibility is equivalent to the 
term vulnerability as the Samoan phrase for both susceptibility and vulnerability is the same. 
Vision
 –  
A desired destiny. 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
Page  i 
Introduction to the CIM Plan 
T h e   S t r a t e g i c   V i s i o n  
The District Coastal Infrastructure Management (CIM) Plan for Salega District has been prepared as part of the Government of Samoa’s 
Infrastructure Asset Management Programme (IAMP).  The CIM Plan is one of the primary means of implementing the CIM Strategy, which 
was formally approved by the Government of Samoa in February, 2001, as providing the Strategic direction for the management of 
infrastructure (both public and private) within the coastal area. 
The Strategy has as its central vision “Resilience – Coastal Infrastructure and Communities Resilient to Natural Hazards”.  The CIM Plan 
takes this vision and provides the practical tools with which the communities and the government, in partnership, can implement the 
Strategy. 
To be resilient is to be adaptive, responsive and quick to recover so that communities are environmentally, socially and economically 
sustainable.  
(CIM Strategy, January 2001)
T h e   A i m   o f   t h e   C I M   P l a n  
The Aim of the CIM Plan is to help communities and government improve resilience by identifying actions and solutions.  Not all the 
solutions may be actioned immediately but the plan will ensure that issues and options are identified for the long-term improvement in 
resilience of both infrastructure and communities. 
The CIM Plan will: 
1.  Improve the community’s awareness of coastal hazard risks; 
2.  Enable the community and infrastructure providers to reduce coastal hazard risks in villages;  
3.  Enable the community and infrastructure providers to better adapt, respond and recover from cyclones. 
S t r u c t u r e   o f   t h e   P l a n  
The CIM Plan consists of two parts each serving a separate and distinct purpose. 
• 
Plan Development
, which describes the process undertaken in preparing the CIM Plan in conjunction with representatives of the 
Communities involved and the Government and other stakeholders with interests in the Plan area. 
• 
Implementation Guidelines
, which describes the Plans and Actions recommended as outcomes of the process, together with the partner 
responsible for implementing these outcomes.  The participants of the CIM Plan preparation process are acknowledged in the 
Implementation Guidelines
 
Implementation Guidelines 
P u r p o s e   o f   t h e   I m p l e m e n t a t i o n   G u i d e l i n e s  
The Implementation Guidelines describe the solutions proposed that will increase the resilience of the villages in the Plan area and the ways 
these solutions can be implemented.  The solutions are presented for each of the infrastructure items that have moderate to low resilience.  
Where one solution will provide benefits to other items of infrastructure these “Other Benefits” are also noted.  Implementation is 
considered to be the joint responsibility of both the villages and the government in partnership.  The government is responsible for the 
provision of national and district “Public”, infrastructure, while villages are responsible for local and community infrastructure.  The 
responsibility for implementing the proposed actions is also defined.  Solutions for both District infrastructure and Village infrastructure, 
and the responsibility of both partners, should be considered together as they combine to provide for the integrated management of all 
coastal infrastructure. 
The solutions for village infrastructure will usually be the responsibility of the Village and Families in the village to implement.  Advice and 
resources may be available from government to assist the village in implementing these solutions.  In most situations these solutions will also 
provide benefits to both village and district infrastructure and should be considered an integral part of managing coastal infrastructure at 
both levels. 
D u r a t i o n   o f   t h e   P l a n  
The CIM Plan should be reviewed at five-yearly intervals.  During the Plan period, the solutions implemented will be monitored to ensure 
that they are effective in improving resilience.  Some solutions are likely to take longer than five years to implement and the review will take 
the progress of these into account. 
The review of the Implementation Guidelines and the solutions proposed will be undertaken: 
1. 
As part of the Five-yearly CIM Plan review programme. 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
Page  ii 
2. 
Once implemented, the solutions will be monitored on either an annual or five-yearly basis to check the effectiveness of the solution.  
Detailed implementation of the solution will determine the monitoring requirements and Key Performance Indicators. 
Participants in the Plan 
The CIM Plan is a Partnership between the Government of Samoa and the villages within the Plan area.  Both partners have responsibility 
for different levels of infrastructure in the local communities and the Plan gives an integrated approach to the provision of services and 
improvement of resilience now and in the future. 
This Plan incorporates the Faipule District of Salega.   
The Committee for the Faipule District of Salega, confirms the participation of the Villages in the preparation of this Coastal Infrastructure 
Management Plan for Salega District in partnership with the Government of Samoa and its adoption as a Management Plan for the 
implementation of the Coastal Infrastructure Management Strategy. 
Village Meetings: 
Village Representatives: 
• 
Samata 
19 March 2002 
 
 
• 
Fagafau 
20 March 2002 
 
 
• 
Fogatuli 
20 March 2002 
 
 
• 
Sagone 
21 March 2002 
 
 
• 
Fai’a’ai
 
22 March 2002 
 
 
• 
Vaipua 
25 March 2002 
 
 
• 
Fogasavaii 
26 March 2002 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The CIM Plan Committee representing all of the Villages in the area met on 27 March 2002.   
Comments on the draft CIM Plan were received from the Committee on 7 June 2002.
 
Government Departments and Corporations: 
• 
Department of Lands, Survey and Environment 
• 
Ministry of Internal Affairs 
• 
Treasury Department 
• 
Ministry of Works 
The Department of Lands, Survey and Environment, as lead Department of 
Government, on behalf of the participating Government Departments and 
Corporations, confirms the participation of the Government of Samoa in the 
preparation of this Coastal Infrastructure Management Plan and its adoption as a 
Management Plan for the implementation of the Coastal Infrastructure 
Management Strategy. 
• 
Samoa Water Authority 
 
• 
Electric Power Corporation 
Signed: 
• 
Samoa Communications Ltd 
Director of Lands Survey and Environment 
• 
Samoa Land Corporation 
Date: 
 
 
 
The Government of Samoa adopts the Coastal Infrastructure Management Plan for the Faipule District of Salega as a Management Plan 
for the implementation of the Coastal Infrastructure Management Strategy (CIMS). 
 
 
 
Signed: 
Minister of Lands, Survey and Environment, Government of Samoa
 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
Page  1 
1  Salega District Infrastructure 
Infrastructure 
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed 
Other Benefits  Implementation Guidelines 
• 
Construct a replacement road from Fagafau to Samata 
which bypasses areas of active landslip along this 
stretch of road. 
Immediate action required to ensure “lifeline” access 
is maintained
 
Responsibility: Ministry of Works
 
• 
Identify funding/budget requirements and implementation 
programme for construction and development.  
• 
Undertake detailed feasibility study in accordance with 
CIM Strategy Evaluation Model Step 6. 
• 
Select final alignment in consultation with villages. 
• 
Prepare Environmental Impact Assessment. 
Main South Coast 
Road  
• 
To implement a regular drainage inspection programme 
in the District and to ensure that maintenance is 
undertaken regularly. 
• 
To undertake a local education programme on the 
importance of maintaining drains. 
• 
To ensure that the existing drains and culverts are large 
enough, and in the right place, to clear flood waters 
quickly and keep flood waters away from cliff faces.   
• 
Provide new culverts and drains where required to 
improve the overland flow of stormwater and reduce 
flooding behind the road. 
• 
To upgrade cross-section, surface and drainage of 
inland work roads at their intersection with the Main 
South Coast Road. 
Responsibility: Ministry of Works
 
• 
Water 
• 
Electricity  
• 
Telephone  
• 
Village 
houses 
• 
Undertake inspection of culverts along the Main South 
Coast Road. 
• 
Identify areas of flooding along Main South Coast Road 
and arrange programme for remedying problem including 
upgrading culverts and clearing/maintaining roadside 
drains. 
• 
Ensure that drainage is directed away from cliff faces to 
minimise the risk of further landslips. 
• 
Implement education programme on importance of 
maintaining roadside drains. 
Electricity and 
telephone lines in 
CLHZ 
• 
Provision of underground electricity and telephone 
lines. 
• 
Avoid co-location of telephone and electricity lines on 
the same poles.  
Responsibility: Samoa Communications Ltd/ Electric 
Power Corporation
 
• 
Include provision for underground electricity and 
telephone lines where practical and feasible in future 
programmes. 
• 
Co-ordinate distribution networks to avoid overloading 
poles and contributing to line failure. 
 
• 
Provide an upgraded mobile telephone network 
Responsibility: Samoa Communications Ltd
 
• 
Village 
• 
Include provision for expansion of mobile telephone 
network in future programmes. 
All infrastructure 
including the 
lagoon and reef 
systems. 
• 
Identify alternative sustainable sources of sand for 
commercial supply. 
• 
Government to manage commercial sandmining in the 
District. 
Responsibility:  Department of Lands, Survey and 
Environment/Villages
 
• 
District 
• 
Identify specific sites for near shore sustainable sand 
mining to meet commercial demand without depleting 
coastal resources. 
• 
Prepare Environmental Impact Assessments for identified 
sites. 
• 
Government to determine commercial sandmining permit 
applications only after full consideration of the EIA 
presented and the actual and potential effects on the 
location and adjacent land and villages. 
Note:  Refer to Maps to see proposed alignments and locations of intervention solutions. 
F u r t h e r   I s s u e s   R a i s e d   D u r i n g   t h e   C I M   P l a n   P r o c e s s  
The following issue has been raised in consultation but falls outside the scope of the CIM Plan as it relates to infrastructure that is not at risk 
from coastal hazards.  The issue is recorded for further investigation by the responsible agencies so that they may programme a suitable 
response as part of their Annual Plan and budget processes. 
Issue 
Responsibility 
Comment  
The provision of a 
reliable water supply
 
Samoa Water Authority 
Water is a significant issue in the district and the provision of a reliable supply of water for 
domestic use is necessary for the health and safety of the community.  The existing water supply 
and distribution networks are not at risk from coastal hazards and therefore the issue lies outside 
the scope of this Coastal Infrastructure Management Plan.   
Possible solutions may include upgrading the existing water supply and distribution networks or 
the provision of roof water collection tanks to provide for domestic supply. 
The issue is recorded as an item for further investigation by the villages and the appropriate 
agencies. 
 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
Page  2 
Identify suitable 
alternative sources of 
sand
 
Provide an upgraded 
mobile phone network
 
Provision of underground 
electricity and telephone lines
 
Fagafau
 
Main South 
Coast Road 
 
Salega District
 
CLHZ
 
N
 
Implement regular drainage inspections 
and undertake maintance along Main 
South Coast Road
 
 
Provide new culverts and drains 
where required along Main South 
Coast Road 
Undertake education 
campaign on the importance 
of maintaining drains.
 
ASCH
 
To ensure that the existing 
drains and culverts are large 
enough, and in the right 
place, to clear flood waters 
quickly and keep water from 
landslip areas. 
Upgrade cross-section, surface 
and drainage of inland work 
roads at their intersection with 
the Main South Coast Road 
Investige alternative 
road  alignment 
Avoid co-location of 
telephone and electricity 
lines on the same poles.
 
KEY 
 
CEHZ 
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone 
 
CFHZ 
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone 
 
CLHZ
 
Coastlal Landslip Hazard Zone 
 
ASCH
 
Areas Sensitive to Coastal Hazards 
 
 
 
Roads and Tracks 
 
 
Possible Future Road Alignment 
 
 
 
Settlement 
 
 
Building 
Possible Solutions 
Salega District 
(North)
 
CLHZ
 
Scale 
(km) 
3
 
0
 
Samata
 
Fogatuli
 
Government to manage 
commercial sandmining
 
CEHZ
 
ASCH
 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
Page  3 
Identify suitable 
alternative sources of 
sand
 
Provide an upgraded 
mobile phone network
 
Provision of underground 
electricity and telephone lines
 
Main South 
Coast Road 
 
Salega District
 
CLHZ
 
N
 
Implement regular drainage inspections 
and undertake maintance along Main 
South Coast Road
 
 
Provide new culverts and drains 
where required along Main South 
Coast Road 
Undertake education 
campaign on the importance 
of maintaining drains.
 
ASCH
 
To ensure that the existing 
drains and culverts are large 
enough, and in the right 
place, to clear flood waters 
quickly. 
Upgrade cross-section, surface 
and drainage of inland work 
roads at their intersection with 
the Main South Coast Road 
Avoid co-location of 
telephone and electricity 
lines on the same poles.
 
KEY 
 
CEHZ 
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone 
 
CFHZ 
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone 
 
CLHZ
 
Coastlal Landslip Hazard Zone 
 
ASCH
 
Areas Sensitive to Coastal Hazards 
 
 
 
Roads and Tracks 
 
 
Possible Future Road Alignment 
 
 
 
Settlement 
 
 
Building 
Possible Solutions 
Salega District 
(South)
 
CLHZ
 
Scale (km) 
3
 
0
 
Fagatuli
 
Fai’a’ai
 
Vaipua
 
Government to manage 
commercial sandmining
 
Sagone
 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
Page  5 
2  Fagafau Village Infrastructure 
Infrastructure 
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed 
Other 
Benefits 
Implementation Guidelines 
• 
To relocate outside CLHZ when buildings require replacement  
Best long-term solution 
• 
To ensure investment within the hazard zones is considered 
in relation to the potential for damage from landslips. 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
• 
Family decision when building to provide 
long-term protection from coastal hazards. 
• 
Village/Family decision to take into account 
CLHZ when building new houses. 
• 
Identify a new sustainable source for domestic sand in the 
vicinity. 
Responsibility: DLSE
 
 
 
• 
Identify specific sites for near shore 
sustainable sand mining to meet demand 
without depleting coastal resources. 
• 
Prepare Environmental Impact Assessments 
for identified sites. 
• 
Undertake consultation with villages 
affected by the proposed sand mining. 
• 
To continue planting vegetation in coastal areas and to protect 
plants from damage. 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
Natural 
environment 
• 
Village/Families to recognise the role that 
vegetation plays in stabilising coastal areas. 
• 
Areas of accretion to be planted as soon as 
practicable with suitable coastal species. 
• 
To obtain expert advice from MAFF Forestry 
Division when considering planting on or 
near cliff faces. 
Village 
infrastructure in 
CLHZ 
• 
To prevent the dumping of rubbish in the village by 
wholesalers. 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
Natural 
environment 
• 
Village to monitor the dumping of rubbish and 
seek prosecution against those who dump 
rubbish. 
Main South Coast 
Road within CLHZ 
• 
Refer Section 1 
NOTE: Refer to District Infrastructure for solutions related to the Main South Coast Road and drainage. 
 
Main South 
Coast Road 
Lagoon 
Main South Coast 
Road 
CLHZ 
Coastal Cliffs  
CLHZ 
C.
 
Prosecution of 
rubbish 
Landslips  
Fagafau
 
C. 
S. 
KEY 
 
CEHZ 
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone 
 
CFHZ 
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone 
 
CLHZ
 
Coastlal Landslip Hazard Zone 
 
ASCH
 
Areas Sensitive to Coastal Hazards 
 
 
 
Roads and Tracks 
 
 
 
Settlement 
 
 
Building 
 
C. 
Church 
 
Scale (km) 
3
 
0
 
To continue planting vegetation 
in coastal areas and to protect 
plants from damage. 
Possible Solutions  
Fagafau Village 
Scale  
 
N
To ensure investment within the 
hazard zones is considered in 
relation to the potential for damage 
from coastal erosion, landslip and 
To relocate outside CLHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to 
ensure investment within the hazard 
zones is considered in relation to the 
potential for damage from landslips
.
 
Identify a sustainable 
source of sand in the 
vicinity.
 
Village management of 
domestic sand-mining.
 
ASCH 
Lovers leap fale
 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
Page  7 
3  Samata Village Infrastructure 
Infrastructure 
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed 
Other Benefits  Implementation Guidelines 
• 
Identify a new sustainable source for domestic sand in the 
vicinity. 
Responsibility: DLSE
 
• 
 
• 
Identify specific sites for near shore sustainable 
sand mining to meet demand without depleting 
coastal resources. 
• 
Prepare Environmental Impact Assessments for 
identified sites. 
• 
Undertake consultation with villages affected by 
the proposed sand mining. 
• 
To relocate outside CLHZ when buildings require 
replacement.  
Best long-term solution 
• 
To ensure investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for damage from 
coastal erosion 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
• 
Family decision when building to provide long-
term protection from landslips. 
• 
Village/Family decision to relocate in the long-term 
or when building new houses. 
Village houses in 
CLHZ 
• 
To continue planting vegetation in coastal areas and to 
protect plants from damage. 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
• 
Village/Families to recognise the role that 
vegetation plays in stabilising coastal areas. 
• 
Areas of accretion to be planted as soon as 
practicable with suitable coastal species. 
• 
To obtain expert advice from MAFF Forestry 
Division when considering planting on or near cliff 
faces. 
 
• 
To undertake maintenance along road edge  
Responsibility: Village/Families
 
 
• 
Village/Family to accept responsibility for 
maintaining roadside 
Main South Coast 
Road within CLHZ 
• 
Refer section 1. 
Possible Solutions  
Samata Village
 
 
N
Lagoon 
Main South 
Coast Road 
CFHZ 
To provide for an inland 
road outside the Hazard 
Zones to facilitate future 
relocation.  
To relocate outside the hazard zones or to 
ensure investment in the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential 
damage. 
Village management of 
domestic sand-mining. 
Identify a sustainable source 
for domestic sand in the 
vicinity. 
To continue planting 
vegetation in coastal areas 
and to protect plants from 
damage. 
To undertake 
maintenance along road 
edge
 
Rocky coast 
CLHZ 
C. 
CLHZ 
S. 
Landslips
 
Absence of 
sand
 
Flooding
 
Inland flooding 
and siltation 
Main South 
Coast Road 
S. 
Samata i tai 
Coastal 
access track
 
Samata i uta
 
C.
 
C.
 
P.S.
 
Water  
Spring
 
W. 
KEY 
 
CEHZ 
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone 
 
CFHZ 
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone 
 
CLHZ
 
Coastlal Landslip Hazard Zone 
 
ASCH
 
Areas Sensitive to Coastal Hazards 
 
 
 
Roads and Tracks 
 
 
 
Settlement 
 
 
Building 
 
C. 
Church 
S. 
School 
 
W.  
Women’s Committee House 
 
P.S 
Pre School 
Scale (km) 
3
 
0
 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
Page  9 
4  Fogatuli Village Infrastructure 
Infrastructure 
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed 
Other Benefits  Implementation Guidelines 
• 
Village management of domestic sand mining 
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
 
• 
Village to share with government control over sand 
mining activities. 
• 
Identify a new sustainable source for domestic sand in the 
vicinity. 
Responsibility: DLSE
 
 
• 
Identify specific sites for near shore sustainable 
sand mining to meet demand without depleting 
coastal resources. 
• 
Prepare Environmental Impact Assessments for 
identified sites. 
• 
Undertake consultation with villages affected by 
the proposed sand mining. 
• 
To relocate outside CLHZ when buildings require 
replacement  
Best long-term solution 
• 
To ensure investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for damage from 
coastal erosion 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
• 
Family decision when building to provide long-
term protection from landslips. 
• 
Village/Family decision to relocate in the long-term 
or when building new houses. 
Village houses in 
CLHZ  
• 
To continue planting vegetation in coastal areas and to 
protect plants from damage. 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
• 
Village/Families to recognise the role that 
vegetation plays in stabilising coastal areas. 
• 
Areas of accretion to be planted as soon as 
practicable with suitable coastal species. 
• 
To establish a marine protected area 
Responsibility: Village/Families/MAF Fisheries
 
 
• 
Village to approach MAFF with proposed extent of 
Marine Protected Area and management approach. 
• 
Protection to maintain the continued health of the 
reef ecosystem. 
All infrastructure 
• 
To undertake maintenance along road edge  
Responsibility: Village/Families
 
 
• 
Village/Family to accept responsibility for 
maintaining roadside 
NOTE:  Consideration has also been given to the improvement of coastal access tracks. Any decision to upgrade coastal access tracks must 
be made by the village.  Upgrading the coastal track would also need to take into account the possible negative impacts of construction and 
the likely increase in sandmining that will be associated with such a development and the negative effect of such sandmining.  Design advice 
should be sought before any works proceed in order to ensure that negative impacts on the environment are appropriately managed and 
recognise the potential for landslip damage.
Possible Solutions  
Fogatuli Village
 
 
To relocate outside the hazard zones or to 
ensure investment in the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential damage 
Village management of 
domestic sand-mining. 
Identify a sustainable source 
for domestic sand in the 
vicinity. 
To continue planting 
vegetation in coastal areas 
and to protect plants from 
To undertake 
maintenance along road 
edge
 
N
CLHZ 
Lagoon 
CLHZ 
Spring 
Main South 
Coast Road 
Main South Coast Road 
Reef
 
CLHZ
 
Spring 
C. 
C. 
Fogatuli 
Work Road
 
Landslips
 
Cemetary
 
KEY 
 
CEHZ 
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone 
 
CFHZ 
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone 
 
CLHZ
 
Coastlal Landslip Hazard Zone 
 
 
Roads and Tracks 
 
 
 
Settlement 
 
 
Building 
 
C
Church 
Access Path
 
Scale (km) 
0
 
Establish Marine 
Protected Area to 
maintain the health of the 
reef and lagoon systems
 
0.5 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
Page  11 
5  Fai’a’ai Village Infrastructure 
Infrastructure 
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed 
Other Benefits  Implementation Guidelines 
• 
Village management of domestic sand mining 
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
 
• 
Village to share with government control over sand 
mining activities. 
• 
Identify a new sustainable source for domestic sand in the 
vicinity. 
Responsibility: DLSE
 
 
• 
Identify specific sites for near shore sustainable 
sand mining to meet demand without depleting 
coastal resources. 
• 
Prepare Environmental Impact Assessments for 
identified sites. 
• 
Undertake consultation with villages affected by 
the proposed sand mining. 
• 
To relocate outside CLHZ when buildings require 
replacement  
Best long-term solution 
• 
To ensure investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for damage from 
coastal erosion 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
• 
Family decision when building to provide long-
term protection from landslips. 
• 
Village/Family decision to relocate in the long-
term or when building new houses. 
All infrastructure  
• 
To continue planting vegetation in coastal areas and to 
protect plants from damage. 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
• 
Village/Families to recognise the role that 
vegetation plays in stabilising coastal areas. 
• 
Areas of accretion to be planted as soon as 
practicable with suitable coastal species. 
 
• 
To undertake maintenance along road edge  
 
Responsibility: Village/Families
 
 
• 
.Village/Family to accept responsibility for 
maintaining roadside 
Note: Consideration has also been given to the improvement of coastal access tracks. Any decision to upgrade coastal access tracks must be 
made by the village.  Upgrading the coastal track would also need to take into account the possible negative impacts of construction and the 
likely increase in sandmining that will be associated with such a development and the negative effect of such sandmining.  Design advice 
should be sought before any works proceed in order to ensure that negative impacts on the environment are appropriately managed and 
recognise the potential for landslip damage.  Poor water supply is also identified in Section 1 as an issue raised in consultation. 
Possible Solutions  
Fai’a’ai Village
 
 
To continue to relocate outside the hazard 
zones or to ensure investment in the hazard 
zones is considered in relation to the 
potential damage. 
Village management of 
domestic sand-mining. 
Identify a sustainable source 
for domestic sand in the 
vicinity. 
To continue planting 
vegetation in coastal areas 
and to protect plants from 
To undertake 
maintenance along road 
edge
 
Lagoon 
CLHZ 
CEHZ 
Main South 
Coast Road 
Main South 
Coast Road 
Inland 
flooding
 
Coastal 
access path 
Unsealed Work 
Road
  
Faiaai 
Poor water 
supply
 
KEY 
 
CEHZ 
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone 
 
CFHZ 
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone 
 
CLHZ
 
Coastlal Landslip Hazard Zone 
 
 
Roads and Tracks 
 
 
 
Settlement 
 
 
Building 
 
C. 
Church 
 
S.S. 
Secondary School 
 
S.S 
C.
 
C.
 
C.
 
Spring 
Spring 
Scale (km) 
0.5 
0
 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
Page  13 
6  Vaipua Village Infrastructure 
Infrastructure 
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed 
Other Benefits  Implementation Guidelines 
• 
Village management of domestic sand mining 
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
 
• 
Village to share with government control over sand 
mining activities. 
• 
Identify a new sustainable source for domestic sand in the 
vicinity. 
Responsibility: DLSE
 
 
• 
Identify specific sites for near shore sustainable 
sand mining to meet demand without depleting 
coastal resources. 
• 
Prepare Environmental Impact Assessments for 
identified sites. 
• 
Undertake consultation with villages affected by 
the proposed sand mining. 
• 
To relocate outside CLHZ to where infrastructure already 
exists when buildings require replacement  
Best long-term solution 
• 
To ensure investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for damage from 
coastal erosion 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
• 
Family decision when building to provide long-
term protection from landslips. 
• 
Village/Family decision to relocate in the long-
term or when building new houses. 
Village houses in 
CLHZ  
• 
To continue planting vegetation in coastal areas and to 
protect plants from damage. 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
• 
Village/Families to recognise the role that 
vegetation plays in stabilising coastal areas. 
• 
Areas of accretion to be planted as soon as 
practicable with suitable coastal species. 
All infrastructure 
• 
To construct culverts and drainage ditches along work 
roads. 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
• 
Village/Families to take into account the impact of 
roads and other structures on the flow of storm 
water and implement drainage as appropriate. 
 
• 
To undertake maintenance along road edge  
Responsibility: Village/Families
 
 
• 
.Village/Family to accept responsibility for 
maintaining roadside 
Note: Excavation of a hole in the reef has also been considered in the assessment of solutions for Vaipua Village.  The assessment shows that 
the environmental impacts of breaking through the reef are substantial and irreversible.  In particular, the reef provides important 
protection for the beach and cliff face from the open sea.  To remove part of the reef would affect tidal flows and sediment transport and 
would likely increase rates of erosion in this area.
   
Consideration has also been given to the improvement of coastal access tracks. Any decision to upgrade coastal access tracks must be made 
by the village.  Upgrading the coastal track would also need to take into account the possible negative impacts of construction and the likely 
increase in sandmining that will be associated with such a development and the negative effect of such sandmining.  Design advice should be 
sought before any works proceed in order to ensure that negative impacts on the environment are appropriately managed and recognise the 
potential for landslip damage.
  
 
Possible Solutions  
Vaipua Village
 
 
To continue to relocate outside the hazard 
zones or to ensure investment in the hazard 
zones is considered in relation to the 
potential damage. 
Village management of 
domestic sand-mining. 
Identify a sustainable source 
for domestic sand in the 
vicinity. 
To continue planting 
vegetation in coastal areas 
and to protect plants from 
To undertake 
maintenance along road 
edge
 
Lagoon 
CEHZ 
CLHZ 
C. 
Main South 
Coast Road  
Work Road 
Main South 
Coast Road
  
C. 
S. 
Inland flooding 
Vaipua  
Poor water 
supply
 
KEY 
 
CEHZ 
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone 
 
CFHZ 
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone 
 
CLHZ
 
Coastlal Landslip Hazard Zone 
 
 
Roads and Tracks 
 
 
Building 
 
C. 
Church 
 
S. 
School 
Scale (km) 
0.5 
0
 
To improve drainage 
along work roads
 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
Page  15 
7  Fogasavaii Village Infrastructure 
Infrastructure 
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed 
Other Benefits  Implementation Guidelines 
Village houses in 
CLHZ  
• 
To relocate outside CLHZ when buildings require 
replacement or to ensure investment within the hazard 
zones is considered in relation to the potential for damage 
from coastal erosion  
Best long-term solution
 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
 
• 
Family decision when building to provide long-
term protection from landslips. 
• 
Village/Family decision to relocate in the long-
term or when building new houses. 
All infrastructure 
• 
Identify a new sustainable source for domestic sand in the 
vicinity. 
• 
Responsibility: DLSE
 
 
• 
Identify specific sites for near shore sustainable 
sand mining to meet demand without depleting 
coastal resources. 
• 
Prepare Environmental Impact Assessments for 
identified sites. 
• 
Undertake consultation with villages affected by 
the proposed sand mining. 
 
• 
Village management of domestic sand mining 
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
 
 
• 
Village to share with government control over sand 
mining activities. 
 
• 
To continue to locate outside CLHZ or to ensure investment 
within the hazard zones is considered in relation to the 
potential for damage from landslips.  
Best long-term solution
 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
• 
Family decision when building to provide long-
term protection from landslips. 
• 
Village/Family decision to relocate in the long-
term or when building new houses. 
 
• 
To continue planting vegetation in coastal areas and to 
protect plants from damage. 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
• 
Village/Families to recognise the role that 
vegetation plays in stabilising coastal areas. 
• 
Areas of accretion to be planted as soon as 
practicable with suitable coastal species. 
 
• 
Establish forestry conservation areas within the CLHZ and 
CEHZ and on adjacent land. 
Responsibility:  Village/MAF Forestry
 
 
• 
Village to approach MAF Forest with proposed 
extent of Conservation Area and management 
approach. 
• 
Protection to maintain coastal vegetation and 
discourage asset relocation to hazard zones. 
 
• 
To undertake maintenance along road edge  
Responsibility: Village/Families
 
 
• 
.Village/Family to accept responsibility for 
maintaining roadside 
NOTE:  Consideration has also been given to the improvement of coastal access tracks. Any decision to upgrade coastal access tracks must 
be made by the village.  Upgrading the coastal track would also need to take into account the possible negative impacts of construction and 
the likely increase in sandmining that will be associated with such a development and the negative effect of such sandmining.  Design advice 
should be sought before any works proceed in order to ensure that negative impacts on the environment are appropriately managed and 
recognise the potential for landslip damage. 
Possible Solutions  
Fogasavaii Village
 
 
To continue to relocate outside the hazard 
zones or to ensure investment in the hazard 
zones is considered in relation to the 
potential damage. 
Village management of 
domestic sand-mining. 
Identify a sustainable source 
for domestic sand in the 
vicinity. 
To continue planting 
vegetation in coastal areas 
and to protect plants from 
damage. 
To undertake 
maintenance along road 
edge
 
N
Main South 
Coast Road 
Lagoon 
CLHZ 
C. 
CEHZ 
KEY 
 
CEHZ 
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone 
 
CFHZ 
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone 
 
 
Roads and Tracks 
 
 
Building 
 
S. 
School 
 
C. 
Church 
Coastal Access 
Path  
Cemetary 
Inland flooding 
Main South 
Coast Road  
S. 
Fogasavaii 
Provision of a 
reliable water supply
 
Scale (km) 
0
 
Possible forestry 
conservation area
 
0.5 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
Page  17 
8  Sagone Village Infrastructure 
Infrastructure 
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed 
Other Benefits  Implementation Guidelines 
 
 
 
• 
 
All infrastructure 
• 
To continue to locate outside CLHZ or to ensure investment 
within the hazard zones is considered in relation to the 
potential for damage from landslips.  
Best long-term solution
 
• 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
• 
Family decision when building to provide long-
term protection from landslips. 
• 
Village/Family decision to relocate in the long-
term or when building new houses. 
 
• 
Identify a new sustainable source for domestic sand in the 
vicinity. 
Responsibility: DLSE
 
 
• 
Identify specific sites for near shore sustainable 
sand mining to meet demand without depleting 
coastal resources. 
• 
Prepare Environmental Impact Assessments for 
identified sites. 
• 
Undertake consultation with villages affected by 
the proposed sand mining. 
 
• 
Village management of domestic sand mining 
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
 
 
• 
Village to share with government control over sand 
mining activities. 
 
• 
To continue planting vegetation in coastal areas and to 
protect plants from damage. 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
 
 
• 
Village/Families to recognise the role that 
vegetation plays in stabilising coastal areas. 
• 
Areas of accretion to be planted as soon as 
practicable with suitable coastal species. 
 NOTE:  Consideration has also been given to the improvement of the coastal access road, which passes the school. Any decision to upgrade 
this road must be made by the village.  Upgrading the road would also need to take into account the possible negative impacts of 
construction and the likely increase in sandmining that will be associated with such a development and the negative effect of such 
sandmining on the coast.  Design advice should be sought before any works proceed in order to ensure that negative impacts on the 
environment are appropriately managed and recognise the potential for erosion damage. 
Possible Solutions  
Sagone Village
 
 
N
Main South 
Coast Road 
CEHZ 
Lagoon 
C. 
S. 
CEHZ 
KEY 
 
CEHZ 
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone 
 
CFHZ 
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone 
 
 
Roads and Tracks 
 
 
Building 
 
C
Church 
 
S.  
School 
 
P. S 
Pre school 
 
C. 
S. 
Cemetary
 
Reef
 
Coastal Access 
Road
 
C. 
Irregular water supply
 
Sagone 
P.S. 
W. 
Scale (km) 
0.5 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SALEGA DISTRICT  
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 
 
 
Page  6