background image
Coastal Infrastructure Management Plan
Falealili District
Implementation Guidelines
February 2002
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Table of Contents
Introduction to the CIM Plan
i
Implementation Guidelines
i
Participants in the Plan
ii
1
Falealili District Infrastructure
1
2
Saleilua Village Infrastructure
6
3
Poutasi Village Infrastructure
8
4
Vaovai Village Infrastructure
10
5
Matautu Village Infrastructure
12
6
Tafatafa/Matavai Village Infrastructure
14
7
Malaemalu Village Infrastructure
16
8
Satalo Village Infrastructure
18
9
Sapunaoa/Piu Vil lage Infrastructure
20
10
Salesatele Village Infrastructure
22
11
Si’uniu Village Infrastructure
24
12
Salani Village Infrastructure
26
13
Sapo’e Village Infrastructure
28
G l o s s a r y
Coastal Hazard Zones 
Defined areas landward of the coast which are or are considered likely to be subject to the effects of hazards 
over a defined assessment period. In this study, reference is made to four coastal hazard zones: ASCHs (areas 
sensitive to coastal hazards); CEHZs (coastal erosion hazard zones); CFHZs (coastal flood hazard zones) and 
CLHZs (coastal landslip hazard zones).
“Do Minimum” option -
A Management option that involves continuing with the present maintenance and upgrading programme on 
an as and when required basis.
Hazard -
A source of potential harm or a situation with a potential to cause loss.
Infrastructure 
Built structures and networks which support the national, regional or local community.
Lifeline infrastructure
Infrastructure that contributes directly to the survival of the community and its ability to respond and 
recover at the time of extreme events.
Secondary infrastructure
Infrastructure that contributes to the every-day development of the community.
Implementation Guidelines – A document to guide land use and resource practices to achieve specified goals, objectives and policies and 
provide a framework for the implementation of defences and works.
Issue 
A specific concern regarding both cause and effect.
Land and Resource Use 
The use of land and resources by the community for social, economic or other benefit (e.g. land use includes 
areas used for villages or crops, resource use includes activities such as sand mining, gravel extraction or 
fishing).
Monitoring 
Process of measuring the effectiveness or impacts of projects and works against predicted standards, levels or 
outcomes.
Resilience -
The ability to be adaptive, responsive and quick to recover.
Community Resilience
The ability for the community to be adaptive, responsive and quick to recover from the adverse effects 
of hazard.
Natural Resilience
The ability of natural systems to be adaptive, responsive and quick to recover from coastal processes 
or hazards.
Risk 
The chance of something happening that will have an impact on objectives.  It is measured in terms of 
consequence and likelihood.  In the Coastal Infrastructure Management Plan context it is the likelihood that
infrastructure will be subject to coastal hazards and the potential for loss of property, life or land due to 
natural processes.
Stakeholders -
Those people and organisations who may affect, be affected by, or perceive themselves to be affected by, a 
decision or activity.  The term stakeholder may also include interested parties.
Strategy 
Direction or course of action to achieve a defined vision.
Susceptibility -
The degree to which infrastructure at risk is likely to be damaged by coastal hazards and how easy/difficult, 
expensive/cheap it is to replace.  In the context of the CIM Plan the term susceptibility is equivalent to the 
term vulnerability as the Samoan phrase for both susceptibility and vulnerability is the same.
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page ii
Vision 
A desired destiny.
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page i
Introduction to the CIM Plan
T h e   S t r a t e g i c   V i s i o n
The District Coastal Infrastructure Management (CIM) Plan for Falealili District has been prepared as part of the Government of Samoa’s 
Infrastructure Asset Management Programme (IAMP).  The CIM Plan is one of the primary means of implementing the CIM Strategy, which 
was formally approved by the Government of Samoa in February, 2001, as providing the Strategic direction for the management of 
infrastructure (both public and private) within the coastal area.
The Strategy has as its central vision “Resilience – Coastal Infrastructure and Communities Resilient to Natural Hazards”.  The CIM Plan 
takes this vision and provides the practical tools with which the communities and the government, in partnership, can implement the 
Strategy.
To be resilient is to be adaptive, responsive and quick to recover so that communities are environmentally, socially and economically 
sustainable.
(CIM Strategy, January 2001).
T h e   A i m   o f   t h e   C I M   P l a n
The Aim of the CIM Plan is to help communities and government improve resilience by identifying actions and solutions.  Not all the 
solutions may be actioned immediately but the plan will ensure that issues and options are identified for the long-term improvement in 
resilience of both infrastructure and communities.
The CIM Plan will:
1. Improve the community’s awareness of coastal hazard risks;
2. Enable the community and infrastructure providers to reduce coastal hazard risks in villages; 
3. Enable the community and infrastructure providers to better adapt, respond and recover from cyclones.
S t r u c t u r e   o f   t h e   P l a n
The CIM Plan consists of two parts each serving a separate and distinct purpose.
• 
Plan Development, which describes the process undertaken in preparing the CIM Plan in conjunction with representatives of the 
Communities involved and the Government and other stakeholders with interests in the Plan area.
• 
Implementation Guidelines, which describes the Plans and Actions recommended as outcomes of the process, together with the partner 
responsible for implementing these outcomes.  The participants of the CIM Plan preparation process are acknowledged in the 
Implementation Guidelines.
Implementation Guidelines
P u r p o s e   o f   t h e   I m p l e m e n t a t i o n   G u i d e l i n e s
The Implementation Guidelines describe the solutions proposed that will increase the resilience of the villages in the Plan area and the ways 
these solutions can be implemented.  The solutions are presented for each of the infrastructure items that have moderate to low resilience.
Where one solution will provide benefits to other items of infrastructure these “Other Benefits” are also noted.  Implementation is 
considered to be the joint responsibility of both the villages and the government in partnership.  The government is responsible for the 
provision of national and district “Public”, infrastructure, while villages are responsible for local and community infrastructure.  The 
responsibility for implementing the proposed actions is also defined.  Solutions for both District infrastructure and Village infrastructure, 
and the responsibility of both partners, should be considered together as they combine to provide for the integrated management of all 
coastal infrastructure.
The solutions for village infrastructure will usually be the responsibility of the Village and Families in the village to implement.  Advice and 
resources may be available from government to assist the village in implementing these solutions.  In most situations these solutions will also 
provide benefits to both village and district infrastructure and should be considered an integral part of managing coastal infrastructure at 
both levels.
D u r a t i o n   o f   t h e   P l a n
The CIM Plan should be reviewed at five-yearly intervals.  During the Plan period, the solutions implemented will be monitored to ensure 
that they are effective in improving resilience.  Some solutions are likely to take longer than five years to implement and the review will take 
the progress of these into account.
The review of the Implementation Guidelines and the solutions proposed will be undertaken:
1.
As part of the Five-yearly CIM Plan review programme.
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page ii
2.
Once implemented, the solutions will be monitored on either an annual or five-yearly basis to check the effectiveness of the solution.
Detailed implementation of the solution will determine the monitoring requirements and Key Performance Indicators.
Participants in the Plan
The CIM Plan is a Partnership between the Government of Samoa and the villages within the Plan area.  Both partners have responsibility 
for different levels of infrastructure in the local communities and the Plan gives an integrated approach to the provision of services and 
improvement of resilience now and in the future.
This Plan incorporates the Faipule District of Falealili.
The Committee for the Faipule District of Falealili, confirms the participation of the Villages in the preparation of this Coastal Infrastructure 
Management Plan for Falealili District in partnership with the Government of Samoa and its adoption as a Management Plan for the 
implementation of the Coastal Infrastructure Management Strategy.
Village Meetings:
Village Representatives:
• 
Saleilua
1 October 2001
• 
Poutasi
2 October 2001
• 
Vaovai
3 October 2001
• 
Matautu
4 October 2001
• 
Tafatafa/Matavai
9 October 2001
• 
Malaemalu
8 October 2001
• 
Satalo
26 September 2001
• 
Sapunaoa/Piu
27 September 2001
• 
Salesatele
28 September 2001
• 
Si’uniu
9 October 2001
• 
Salani
10 October 2001
• 
Sapo’e
11 October 2001
The CIM Plan Committee representing all of the Villages in the area met on 11 October and 20 November 2001.
Comments on the draft CIM Plan were received from the Committee on 29 November 2001.
Government Departments and Corporations:
• 
Department of Lands, Survey and Environment
• 
Ministry of Internal Affairs
• 
Treasury Department
• 
Public Works Department
The Department of Lands, Survey and Environment, as lead Department of 
Government, on behalf of the participating Government Departments and 
Corporations, confirms the participation of the Government of Samoa in the 
preparation of this Coastal Infrastructure Management Plan and its adoption as a 
Management Plan for the implementation of the Coastal Infrastructure 
Management Strategy.
• 
Samoa Water Authority
• 
Electric Power Corporation
Signed:
• 
Samoa Communications Ltd
Director of Lands Survey and Environment
• 
Samoa Land Corporation
Date:
Other stakeholders in the Plan area include:
• 
Salani Surf Resort
The Government of Samoa adopts the Coastal Infrastructure Management Plan for the Faipule District of Falealili as a Management Plan 
for the implementation of the Coastal Infrastructure Management Strategy (CIMS).
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page iii
Signed:
Minister of Lands, Survey and Environment, Government of Samoa
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 1
1
Falealili District Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
•  Replace existing South Coast Road fords at Malaemalu 
and Poutasi with bridges or larger culverts.
New bridges 2 x 10 m
20 m
Approximate cost 
Bridges including approach works
($T100,000/m)
$T2,000,000
Best long-term solution for maintaining lifeline access 
along South Coast Road and improving natural lagoon 
processes.
•  Prepare programme for replacement of fords and bridges 
identified as being inadequate, causing flooding, blocking 
sediment transfer and cutting life-line access.
•  Undertake EIA as required.
•  Prepare contract documents. 
•  Include in Asset Management Register where not currently 
registered.
South Coast Road 
including fords, 
bridges and the 
upgraded Salani –
Aleipata section of 
the road
•  Improved maintenance program, including clearing 
sediment and debris from upstream locations and 
culverts.
Responsibility: Public Works Department
•  Undertake maintenance inspection of fords and bridges in 
Falealili District.
•  Include in Asset Management Register where not currently 
registered.
•  Prepare programme for maintenance where required.
•  Provide drainage culverts or bridges in areas where the 
road is blocking the natural overland flow path for 
example, at Poutasi where the Police Station may be 
flooded.
Responsibility: Public Works Department
•  Prepare programme for construction of culverts and/or bridges 
identified as being required to prevent flooding and cutting life-
line access.
•  Undertake EIA as required.
•  Include in Asset Management Register where appropriate.
•  Protect exposed drainage ditches and earthworks.
Responsibility: Public Works Department
•  Ensure sediment control measures are used on areas of 
exposed earthworks.
Responsibility: Public Works Department
•  Prepare programme to complete protection and sediment control 
works.
•  Replant edges of streams
Responsibility: Public Works Department
•  Wetland
•  Lagoon
•  Reef system
•  Coastal
Villages
•  Prepare programme to complete replanting.
•  To inspect all Government funded seawalls in the 
District, complete those that are not finished and to 
ensure that maintenance is undertaken regularly.
Responsibility: Public Works Department 
•  Electricity
•  Telephone
•  Village
•  Undertake maintenance inspection of seawalls in Falealili
District.
•  Include in Asset Management Register.
•  Prepare programme for maintenance and completion where 
required.
•  Improved maintenance program, including clearing 
sediment and debris from upstream locations and 
culverts.
•  Responsibility: Public Works Department/Villages
•  Provide drainage culverts or bridges in areas where the 
road is blocking the natural overland flow path for 
example at Sapo’e.
Responsibility: Public Works Department/Villages
•  Protect exposed drainage ditches and earthworks.
Responsibility: Public Works Department/Villages
•  Village
•  Undertake maintenance inspection of roadside drains and 
culverts.
•  Prepare programme for maintenance and upgradingvwhere 
required.
Coastal Feeder 
Roads
•  Redesign estuary crossings at Poutasi and Vaovai to 
allow fish passage, sediment transfer and tidal flows.
Approximate cost to replace with box culvert or similar
(2 x $T300,000)
$T600,000
Best long-term solution to maintain and improve the 
natural environment and biodiversity of the wetlands.
Responsibility: Public Works Department/Department of 
Lands, Survey and Environment.
•  Wetlands
•  Undertake detailed study of benefits and costs to the natural and 
social environment.
•  Seek funding to replace culverts with suitably sized culverts or 
open bridges.
•  Undertake EIA for chosen solution.
•  Construct new crossings.
•  To ensure that the coastal road at Satalo does not block 
the natural flow of water to and from the wetland area.
Responsibility: Public Works Department/Village
•  Wetlands
•  Investigate construction of road along the beach and either 
provide proper culvert crossing or maintain low impact beach 
access.
Main Telephone 
lines
•  Provide for main underground telephone line.
Responsibility: Samoa Communications Ltd
•  Electricity
•  Village
•  Include provision for underground telephone lines where 
practical and feasible in future programmes.  This will also 
benefit main electricity network by removing additional weight 
from electricity poles.  Local telephone lines are light-weight and 
serve limited numbers of houses thus less susceptible to damage.
•  Upgrade mobile telephone network.
Responsibility:  Samoa Communications Ltd
•  Village
•  Include provision for expansion of mobile telephone network in 
future programmes.
Telecommunications
microwave stations
•  Replace with underground network or relocate outside 
of the hazard zones as and when required.
Responsibility:  Samoa Communications Ltd
•  Village
•  Hazard maps to be referred to as part of decision-making and 
investment and structures planned accordingly.
Local electricity 
lines
•  Provision of underground electricity lines.
Responsibility: Samoa Communications Ltd
•  Village
•  Include provision for underground telephone lines where 
practical and feasible in future programmes.
District School
•  Relocate existing buildings above the Flood Hazard 
Z
i
fl
l
l h i h
b
fl
d li i
•  Village
•  Hazard maps provided to be referred to as part of decision-
ki
d i
d
l
d
di
l
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 2
Zone or raise floor level heights above flood limits.
Best long-term solution.
Responsibility: District
making and investment and structures planned accordingly.
•  Finished floor levels to be checked as part of building permit 
process by Public Works Department.
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 3
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
•  Government management of commercial sand mining. 
•  Government to identify sustainable source of sand for 
commercial activities.
Responsibility:  Department of Lands, Survey and 
Environment/Villages
•  District
•  Identify specific sites for near shore sustainable sand mining to
meet commercial demand without depleting coastal resources.
•  Prepare Environmental Impact Assessments for identified sites.
•  Undertake consultation with villages affected by the proposed 
sand mining.
•  Prepare and implement early warning procedures including a
public awareness campaign.
All infrastructure 
including wetlands, 
the lagoon and the 
reef systems.
•  Prevent cattle access to the banks of streams.
Responsibility:  Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry/ 
Land owners
•  Undertake education programme on benefits of proposed 
solution.
•  Maintenance of a filter strip of natural vegetation along 
stream banks.
Responsibility:  Department of Lands, Survey and 
Environment/Ministry of Agricultur and Forestry
•  Village water 
supply
•  Wetlands
•  Lagoon
•  Reef systems
•  Undertake education programme on benefits of proposed 
solution.
•  Prepare planting and stock control programmes.
•  Government and villages to manage reclamation 
processes
Responsibility:  Department of Lands, Survey and 
Environment
•  Ensure that reclamations are undertaken in accordance with the 
permit process.
•  Undertake EIA for all reclamations including consultation with 
people/villages affected by interruption to coastal processes.
•  Provision of early warning systems.
Responsibility:  National Disaster Management 
Committee
•  District
•  Prepare programme for implementation of early warning 
systems.
Note:  Refer to Maps to see proposed alignments and locations of intervention solutions.
F u r t h e r   I s s u e s   R a i s e d   D u r i n g   t h e   C I M   P l a n   P r o c e s s
The following issues have been raised in consultation but fall outside the scope of the CIM Plan as they relate to infrastructure that falls 
outside the coastal area.  The issues are recorded for further investigation by the responsible agencies so that they may programme a 
suitable response as part of their Annual Plan and budget processes.
Issue
Responsibility
Comment
Water Supply
Samoa Water Authority
Water is a significant issue in the district and the provision of a consistent supply of water for domestic use is 
necessary for the health and safety of the community.  Issues include:
• 
Provision of clean supply from river sources unpolluted by adjacent land-use practices.
• 
Maintenance of distribution networks during periods of flooding inland.
• 
Replacement of existing galvanised pipes with PVC pipes to ensure clean supply.
The solutions to these issues lie outside the scope of the CIM Plan as the existing infrastructure is not at risk 
or susceptible to coastal hazards.
The Samoa Water Authority has advised that they are aware of the issues and problems in this area and are 
currently planning to improve the service to the District.
Villages/Families
Villages and families may choose to consider the construction of roof-water collection tanks to supplement 
their existing supply.
South Coast Road 
Public Works Department
The South Coast Road crosses a number of valleys that are not permanent watercourses.  The road at some of 
these points is not adequately provided with culverts or drainage channels resulting in flooding problems 
along the inland side of the road.  The valleys provide important. overland flow paths for stormwater runoff 
and adequate drainage must be provided.
This issue also affects the transport of sediment to the lagoon and issues related to coastal processes noted for 
fords and bridges above.
Other access roads 
and work roads in 
the District
Public Works Department
Concerns were raised in consultation that work was being, or might be, undertaken on access roads and 
work roads without a proper EIA to determine the full impact of the work on the social and physical 
environment and the economic costs and benefits to the community.  It is noted that in the CIM Strategy 
Evaluation Methodology and in the Government of Samoa’s Interim Code of Environmental Practice an EIA 
must be prepared for works including the upgrading of roads.
Crossing the 
Fagatoloa Stream
at Salani
Public Works Department/ 
Villages
An issue was raised concerning the potential for a bridge crossing the Fagatoloa Stream from Salani to 
Sapo’e/Utulaelae.  This is an issue that is considered to be outside of the CIM Plan but a possible solution to 
providing access between the two sides of the stream may be to provide a pedestrian bridge if a road bridge 
is considered to be unsuitable in this area.
This issue is a matter for the villages to follow up with the Public Works Department.
New road to the 
Malaemalu Pool
Villages
Malaemalu village representatives suggested that it would be a benefit to Falealili District to construct a new 
road from the South Coast Road to the Malaemalu Pool as a source of water for other villages in the District.
This is an issue that is outside of the CIM Plan and should be discussed by the villages in the District.
Road safety
Public Works Department/ 
Villages/Electric Power 
Corporation
Concern was raised that some sections of the South Coast Road was unsafe because of speeding cars, 
particularly outside of schools and public buildings.  Other village roads were considered to be unsafe 
because of poor street lighting.  These are issues that should be taken up with the appropriate authority.
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 4
Road to Piu
Public Works Department/ 
Village
Concern was raised that the access road to Piu was not sealed for its full length.
The issue is noted for consideration by the appropriate authority.
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 5
Possible District Solutions
Saleilua - Tafatafa 
No Scale 
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
Saleilua
Poutasi
Vaovai
Matautu
Tafatafa
S
o
u
t
h
 Coast Road
South Coast Road
Lagoon
Lagoon
Beach fales
Ili’ili
Coral Reef
Beach fales
CFHZ
CEHZ
CFHZ
CEHZ
Replace South Coast Road 
fords with bridges or larger 
culverts
Provide culverts and drainage 
ditches to provide for 
overland flow of stormwater 
and reduce flooding.
Redesign estuary crossings 
at Poutasi and Vaovai to 
allow fish passage, sediment 
transfer and tidal flow.
Complete areas of 
unfinished seawalls and 
provide regular
Upgrade mobile 
telephone network.
Improved maintenance 
programme for main road 
bridges, fords and 
Provide underground 
electricity and telephone 
lines.
Build foundations of 
District facilities located 
in CFHZ higher above 
flood limits.
Relocate District 
faciliti es outside CEHZ 
and CFHZ when 
buildings require 
Government to identify 
sustainable source of sand 
for commercial activities.
Government management 
of commercial sand 
mining.
Provide an early 
warning system for 
cyclones.
Replant edges of streams.
Limit farm stock access to 
rivers and streams and maintain 
natural vegetation along banks 
as a filter strip.
Protect exposed drainage 
ditches and earthworks
Ensure sediment control 
measures are used on 
areas of exposed 
earthworks
N
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 6
Possible District Solutions 
Matavai - Sapo’e
No Scale 
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
Malaemalu
Satalo
Salani
Utulaela
Sapo’e
South Coast Road
South Coast Road
Lagoon
Cape Nene
Matavai
Reef Pass
CFHZ
CEHZ
CFHZ
CEHZ
Replace South Coast Road 
fords with bridges or larger 
culverts
Provide culverts and drainage 
ditches to provide for 
overland flow of stormwater 
and reduce flooding.
Complete areas of 
unfinished seawalls and 
provide regular
Upgrade mobile 
telephone network.
Improved maintenance 
programme for main road 
bridges, fords and 
Provide underground 
electricity and telephone 
lines.
Build foundations of 
District facilities located 
in CFHZ higher above 
flood limits.
Relocate District 
facilities outside CEHZ 
and CFHZ when 
buildings require 
Government to identify 
sustainable source of sand 
for commercial activities.
Government management 
of commercial sand 
mining.
Provide an early 
warning system for 
cyclones.
Sapunaoa
Si’uniu
Piu
Salesatele
Protect exposed 
drainage ditches and
earthworks.
Replant banks of rivers 
and streams.
Fagatoloa River
Vailoa Stream
Faga Stream
Vaifaliuga Stream
N
Ensure sediment control 
measures are used on 
areas of exposed
earthworks.
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 6
2
Saleilua Village Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
•  Village management of domestic sand mining
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  Village to share with government control over sand 
mining activities.
•  Identify a sustainable source for domestic sand 
in the vicinity.
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  DLSE to investigate alternative sand sources in 
consultation with Village.
•  Prepare EIA into impacts of sand removal from 
identified areas.
•  To continue to consider building foundations 
at a level that takes into account the CFHZ in 
the vicinity of the building.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
Village houses in the 
CEHZ and/or CFHZ
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to ensure 
investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for 
damage from coastal erosion and flooding.
Best long-term solution.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Village/Families to take note of Hazard maps 
provided and to plan investment and structures 
accordingly.
Access road and 
water supply to Ili’ili
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
road and water supply pipe require 
replacement or to ensure investment within the 
hazard zones is considered in relation to the 
potential for damage from coastal erosion and 
flooding.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Village/Families to take note of Hazard maps 
provided and to plan replacement of road and 
water supply accordingly.
Beach fales
•  Ensure investment is considered in relation to 
the potential for damage from cyclones.
•  Ensure support structures such as kitchens, 
ablutions and dining fales are as far from the 
beach as possible, preferably outside the 
CEHZ
Responsibility: Families/Tourist Operators
•  Families/Tourist Operators to take note of Hazard 
maps provided and to plan investment and 
structures accordingly.
Coastal Pools
•  To either abandon pools or to build water-
proof pool wall higher and allow for higher 
outlet to limit sand entering and retain 
freshwater.
Responsibility: Village/Families
•  Prepare EIA, if required, into possible impacts of 
rebuilding pool.
•  Village/Families to decide whether continued 
investment in the CEHZ is warranted.
NOTE:  An issue was raised concerning debris and silt blocking the mouth of the Togitogiga River.  This does not affect the degree of risk 
or susceptibility in Saleilua village including Ili’ili, and the best solution would be to allow natural processes to clear the river mouth.
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
P.
Pool
Possible Village Solutions Saleilua
Scale 1:10,000
Saleilua
Poutasi
South Coast Road
Lagoon
Ili’ili
CEHZ
Flooding
Church
P.
N
Abandon coastal 
pools
Build pool wall higher and 
allow for higher outlet
Relocate buildings outside 
CEHZ and CFHZ when 
replacement required
Build foundations
higher above flood 
Identify sustainable sand 
source for domestic 
supply
Village management 
of domestic sand 
Possible
location of 
relocated road
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 8
3
Poutasi Village Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
•  Village management of domestic sand mining
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  Village to share with government control over sand 
mining activities.
•  Identify a new sustainable source for domestic 
sand in the vicinity.
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  DLSE to investigate alternative sand sources in 
consultation with Village.
•  Prepare EIA into impacts of sand removal from 
identified areas.
Village houses, 
churches and 
preschool in the 
CEHZ and CFHZ
•  To continue to consider building foundations at 
a level that takes into account the CFHZ in the 
vicinity of the building.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Village/Families to take note of Hazard maps 
provided and to plan investment and structures 
accordingly.
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to ensure 
investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for 
damage from coastal erosion and flooding.
Best long-term solution.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
Structures within the 
wetland areas
•  Remove structures that block the flow of water 
through the wetlands.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Lagoon
•  Reef systems
•  Undertake study of local wetland areas to identify 
structures encroaching on the area and possible 
solutions or alternative proposals.
NOTE:  Seawalls have also been considered in the assessment of solutions for Poutasi Village.  The assessment shows that the cost of 
building and maintaining the seawalls is 2.5 times the benefits they provide to the community.
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
Culverts
D.S.
District School
P S
P
h l
Possible Village Solutions 
Poutasi
Scale 1:10,000
N
Saleilua
Poutasi
South Coast Road
Lagoon
Wetlands
D.S.
Vaovai
Store
Police Station
CEHZ
CFHZ
P.S.
Boat Ramp 
and fishing
boats
Church
Church
Relocate buildings outside 
CEHZ and CFHZ when 
replacement required
Build foundations
higher above flood 
Identify sustainable sand 
source for domestic 
l
Village management
of domestic sand 
i i
Remove structures that 
block the flow of water 
through the wetlands.
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 10
4
Vaovai Village Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
•  Village management of domestic sand mining.
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  Village to share with government control over 
sand mining activities.
•  Identify a new sustainable source for domestic 
sand in the vicinity
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  DLSE to investigate alternative sand sources in 
consultation with Village.
•  Prepare EIA into impacts of sand removal from 
identified areas.
Village houses and 
church in CEHZ and 
CFHZ
•  To continue to consider building foundations at 
a level that takes into account the CFHZ in the 
vicinity of the building.
Responsibility:  Families
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to ensure 
investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for 
damage from coastal erosion and flooding.
Best long-term solution.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Village/Families to take note of Hazard maps 
provided and to plan investment and structures 
accordingly.
Village houses in 
CFHZ
•  To continue to consider building foundations at 
a level that takes into account the CFHZ in the
vicinity of the building.
Responsibility:  Families
•  Village/Families to take note of Hazard maps 
provided and to plan investment and structures 
accordingly.
NOTE:  A seawall has also been considered in the assessment of solutions for Vaovai Village.  The assessment shows that the cost of 
building and maintaining a 20-year design seawall 300 m long to protect the road and houses in the CEHZ is 3 times the benefits it provides 
to the community.
An issue of concern raised during consultation was the poor drainage in front of the school.  As the school is outside of the CEHZ and 
CFHZ this is outside of the scope of the CIM Plan but may be considered by the Village and the Public Works Department in partnership as 
a separate issue.
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
Culverts
S.
School
P.S.
Pre-school
P.
Pool
Possible Village Solutions 
Vaovai
Scale 1:10,000
N
Poutasi
Lagoon
P.
Vaovai
CEHZ
CFHZ
P.S.
Church
Relocate buildings outside 
CEHZ and CFHZ when 
replacement required
Build foundations
higher above flood 
Identify sustainable sand 
source for domestic 
l
Village management 
of domestic sand 
S.
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 12
5
Matautu Village Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
Village  Houses
•  To relocate outside CEHZ when buildings 
require replacement or to ensure investment 
within the hazard zones is considered in 
relation to the potential for damage from coastal 
erosion and flooding.
Best solution for improved long-term resilience.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Village/Families to take note of Hazard maps 
provided and to plan investment and structures
accordingly.
Pool
•  Raise level of outlet. 
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Rebuild pool walls.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Village/families to investigate reconstruction of 
pool to take into account higher relative sea levels.
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
P.
Pool
Possible Village Solutions 
Matautu
Scale 1:10,000
N
Matautu
Vaovai
Hall
Sout
Coast
 R
oad
Lagoon
CEHZ
CFHZ
P.
Relocate buildings 
outside CEHZ when 
replacement required
Raise outlet level of Pool 
Rebuild pool walls
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 14
6
Tafatafa/Matavai Village Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
•  Village management of domestic sand mining.
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE 
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  Village to share with government control over sand 
mining activities.
•  Identify a new sustainable source for domestic 
sand in the vicinity
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  DLSE to investigate alternative sand sources in 
consultation with Village.
•  Prepare EIA into impacts of sand removal from 
identified areas.
•  To continue to consider building foundations at 
a level that takes into account the CFHZ in the 
vicinity of the building.
Responsibility:  Families
•  Village/Families to take note of Hazard maps 
provided and to plan investment and structures 
accordingly.
Village houses and 
beach fales in the 
CEHZ and CFHZ
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to ensure 
investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for 
damage from coastal erosion and flooding.Best 
long-term solution.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Ensure support structures such as kitchens, 
ablutions and dining fales are as far from the 
beach as possible, preferably outside the CEHZ.
Responsibility:  Families/Tourist Operators
•  Families/Tourist operators to take note of Hazard 
maps provided and to plan investment and structures 
accordingly.
Possible Village Solutions 
Tafatafa/Matavai
Scale 1:10,000
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
S.
School
W.
Women’s Committee House
N
Tafatafa
Matavai
South Coast Road
Lagoon
W.
CEHZ
CFHZ
S.
Cape Nene
Church
Beach fales
Beach fales
Relocate buildings outside 
CEHZ and CFHZ when 
replacement required
Build foundations 
higher above flood 
Improve road drainage 
to limit flooding
Identify new sustainable 
source for domestic sand in 
the vicinity of the village.
Village management of 
domestic sand mining
W.
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 16
7
Malaemalu Village Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
Village pool within 
the CFHZ
•  Manage land use practice to minimise sediment 
runoff, and to reduce contaminants.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Village
•  Implement education programme in stock management 
for activities next to the pool and streams in the 
catchment.
•  Ensure stock controlled around village pool.
Possible Village Solutions 
Malaemalu
Scale 1:10,000
N
Malaemalu
Matavai
Lagoon
South Coast Road
CEHZ
CFHZ
Church
Satalo
T.
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
P.
Pool
P.
Manage land-use practices to
minimise sediment runoff and 
reduce contaminants
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 18
8
Satalo Village Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
Village houses, within 
the CFHZ and CEHZ
•  Village management of domestic sand mining
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  Village to share with government control over sand 
mining activities.
•  Identify a new sustainable source for domestic 
sand in the vicinity
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  DLSE to investigate alternative sand sources in 
consultation with Village.
•  Prepare EIA into impacts of sand removal from identified 
areas.
•  To continue to consider building foundations at 
a level that takes into account the CFHZ in the 
vicinity of the building.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to ensure 
investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for 
damage from coastal erosion and flooding.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Village/Families to take note of Hazard maps provided
and to plan investment and structures accordingly.
Churches within the 
CFHZ and CEHZ
•  To continue to consider building foundations at 
a level that takes into account the CFHZ in the 
vicinity of the building.
Responsibility: Village/Families/Church
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to ensure 
investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for 
damage from coastal erosion and flooding.
Responsibility: Village/Families/Church
•  Village/Families and Churches to take note of Hazard 
maps provided and to plan investment and structures 
accordingly.
NOTE:  A seawall has also been considered in the assessment of solutions for Satalo Village.  The assessment shows that the cost of building 
and maintaining a 20-year design seawall 250 m long to protect the road and houses in the CEHZ is 3 times the benefits it provides to the 
community.
Possible Village Solutions 
Satalo
Scale 1:10,000
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
D.S
District School
S
School
W
Women’s Committee House
T
Telecommunications tower
N
Malaemalu
Sapunaoa
Lagoon
CEHZ
CFHZ
Satalo
Church
T.
Church
Seawall
Boat ramp
S.
D.S.
W.
Relocate buildings 
outside CEHZ and 
CFHZ when 
l
t
i d
Build foundations 
above flood levels
Identify sustainable 
domestic sand 
Village management of 
domestic sand mining
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 20
9
Sapunaoa/Piu Village Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
•  Village management of domestic sand mining
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  Village to share with government control over sand 
mining activities.
•  Identify a new sustainable source for domestic 
sand in the vicinity
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  DLSE to investigate alternative sand sources in 
consultation with Village.
•  Prepare EIA into impacts of sand removal from identified 
areas.
•  To continue to consider building foundations at 
a level that takes into account the CFHZ in the 
vicinity of the building.
Responsibility:  Village/Families/Churches
Village houses, 
Women’s Committee 
House, pre-school
and churches within 
the CFHZ and CEHZ
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to ensure 
investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for
damage from coastal erosion and flooding.
Responsibility:  Village/Families/Churches
•  Village/Families/Churches to take note of Hazard maps 
provided and to plan investment and structures 
accordingly.
•  To continue to consider building foundations at 
a level that takes into account the CFHZ in the 
vicinity of the building.
Responsibility:  Village/MIA
Primary School 
within the CFHZ
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to ensure 
investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for 
damage from coastal erosion and flooding.
Responsibility:  Village/MIA
•  Village to take note of Hazard maps provided and to plan 
investment and structures accordingly.
NOTE:  Seawalls have also been considered in the assessment of solutions for Sapunaoa Village.  The assessment shows that the cost of 
building and maintaining the seawalls is 3 times the benefits they provide to the community.
Possible Village Solutions 
Sapunaoa/Piu
Scale 1:10,000
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
P.S.
Pre-school
S
School
W
Women’s Committee House
N
Sapunaoa
Salesatele
CEHZ
CFHZ
Satalo
Church
P.S.
Bridge
S.
South Coast Road
Vailoa Stream
W.
Lagoon
Relocate buildings 
outside CEHZ and 
CFHZ when
l
t
i d
Build foundations 
above flood levels
Identify sustainable 
domestic sand 
Village management of 
domestic sand mining
Piu
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 22
10
Salesatele Village Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
•  Village management of domestic sand mining
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  Village to share with government control over sand 
mining activities.
•  Identify a new sustainable source for domestic
sand in the vicinity
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  DLSE to investigate alternative sand sources in 
consultation with Village.
•  Prepare EIA into impacts of sand removal from identified 
areas.
•  To continue to consider building foundations at 
a level that takes into account the CFHZ in the 
vicinity of the building.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
Village houses and 
pre-school within the 
CEHZ and CFHZ
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to ensure 
investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for 
damage from coastal erosion and flooding.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Village/Families to take note of Hazard maps provided 
and to plan investment and structures accordingly.
•  Build up higher and improve drainage to reduce 
flooding.
Responsibility:  Village/PWD
Coastal feeder road
•  Provide drainage culverts and controlled 
stormwater run-off areas to reduce scouring
Responsibility:  Village/PWD
•  Village
•  Village and PWD to investigate drainage issue and agree 
to a suitable resolution
NOTE:  Seawalls have also been considered in the assessment of solutions for Salesatele Village.  The assessment shows that the costs of 
building and maintaining the seawalls is 7 times the benefits they provide to the community.
• 
Possible Village Solutions 
Salesatele
Scale 1:10,000
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
P.S.
Pre-school
S
School
T
Telecommunications tower
N
Sapunaoa
Salani
CEHZ
CFHZ
Salesatele
P.S.
T.
Si’uniu
Lagoon
S.
Bridge
Church
Relocate buildings 
outside CEHZ and 
CFHZ when 
l
t
i d
Build foundations 
above flood levels
Identify sustainable 
domestic sand
Village management of 
domestic sand mining
Build access roads 
higher and improve 
Provide drainage 
culverts and improved 
stormwater run-off
t
ll
Manage the 
construction of 
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 24
11
Si’uniu Village Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
Village Feeder Road
•  Provide more effective drainage along the sides of 
the road.  (See also Implementation Guidelines for 
District Infrastructure in Section 1.)
Responsibility:  Public Works Department/ Village
•  Village
•  Downstream
catchment areas
•  Lagoon
•  Education programme on maintenance of roadside drains 
to show importance of keeping them clear.
•  Implementation of a regular maintenance programme.
•  Assessment of adequacy of overland flow and drainage 
paths to avoid flooding road and other property.
•  Undertake alternative remedies indicated in the 
assessment.
Possible Village Solutions 
Si’uniu
Scale 1:10,000
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
N
Sapunaoa
Salani
CEHZ
CFHZ
Salesatele
Si’uniu
Lagoon
Bridge
South Coast Road
Improve road drainage 
to limit flooding
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 26
12
Salani Village Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
•  Village management of domestic sand mining
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  Village to share with government control over sand 
mining activities.
Village houses, 
primary school, pre-
school and Women’s 
Committee House 
within the CFHZ and 
CEHZ
•  Identify a new sustainable source for domestic 
sand in the vicinity
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure
within CEHZ
•  DLSE to investigate alternative sand sources in 
consultation with Village.
•  Prepare EIA into impacts of sand removal from identified 
areas.
•  To continue to consider building foundations at 
a level that takes into account the CFHZ in the 
vicinity of the building.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to ensure 
investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for 
damage from coastal erosion and flooding.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Village/Families to take note of Hazard maps provided 
and to plan investment and structures accordingly.
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to ensure
investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for 
damage from coastal erosion and flooding.
Responsibility: Samoa Communications Ltd
Microwave relay 
station
•  Raise equipment boxes
Responsibility: Samoa Communications Ltd
•  Samoa Communications Ltd to take note of Hazard maps 
provided and to plan investment and structures
accordingly.
NOTE:  Seawalls have also been considered in the assessment of solutions for Salani Village.  The assessment shows that the cost of building 
and maintaining the seawalls is 4 to 7 times the benefits they provide to the community, depending on where on the coast they are to be 
provided.
Possible Village Solutions 
Salani
Scale 1:10,000
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
T.
Telecommunications Tower
W.
Women’s Committee House
S
School
N
Utulaelae
Salani
CEHZ
CFHZ
Salesatele
Lagoon
Church
South Coast Road
Salani Surf 
Resort
S.
Reef Pass
Store
W.
Fagatoloa Rive
r
T.
Relocate buildings 
outside CEHZ and 
CFHZ when 
l
t
i d
Build foundations 
above flood levels
Identify sustainable 
domestic sand 
Village management of 
domestic sand mining
background image
COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEM ENT PLAN FALEALILI DISTRICT 
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Page 28
13
Sapo’e Village Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Best Solutions and Other Solutions Proposed
Other Benefits
Implementation Guidelines
•  Village management of domestic sand mining.
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  Village to share with government control over sand 
mining activities.
•  Identify a new sustainable source for domestic 
sand in the vicinity.
Responsibility:  Village/DLSE
•  All infrastructure 
within CEHZ
•  Identify specific sites for near shore sustainable sand 
mining to meet commercial demand without depleting 
coastal resources.
•  Prepare Environmental Impact Assessments for identified 
sites.
•  Undertake consultation with villages affected by the 
proposed sand mining.
•  To continue to consider building foundations at 
a level that takes into account the CFHZ in the 
vicinity of the building.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
Village houses in 
CEHZ and CFHZ.
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to ensure 
investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for 
damage from coastal erosion and flooding.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Village/Families to take note of Hazard maps provided 
and to plan investment and structures accordingly.
•  To continue to consider building foundations at 
a level that takes into account the CFHZ in the 
vicinity of the building.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
Village houses, 
churches and Primary 
School in CFHZ.
•  To relocate outside CEHZ and CFHZ when 
buildings require replacement or to ensure 
investment within the hazard zones is 
considered in relation to the potential for 
damage from coastal erosion and flooding.
Responsibility:  Village/Families
•  Village/Families to take note of Hazard maps provided 
and to plan investment and structures accordingly.
Beach fales
•  Ensure investment is considered in relation to 
the potential for damage from cyclones
Responsibility: Families/Tourist operators
•  Ensure support structures such as kitchens, 
ablutions and dining fales are as far from the 
beach as possible, preferably outside the CEHZ.
Responsibility: Families/Tourist operators
•  Families and tourist operators to take note of Hazard 
maps provided and to plan investment and structures 
accordingly.
Possible Village Solutions 
Sapo’e
Scale 1:10,000
KEY
CEHZ
Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone
CFHZ
Coastal Flood Hazard Zone
Roads and Tracks
S.
School
N
Sapo’e
Salani
CEHZ
CFHZ
Utulaelae
Fagatoloa Rive
r
Lagoon
Church
Beach fales
S.
Beach fales
Church
Church
Relocate buildings 
outside CEHZ and 
CFHZ when 
l
t
i d
Build foundations 
above flood levels
Identify sustainable 
domestic sand 
Village management of 
domestic sand mining